2018
DOI: 10.1080/10476210.2018.1465034
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A review of critical literacies in preservice teacher education: pedagogies, shifts, and barriers

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
16
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 30 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
0
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In general, the results confirm pre-service teachers' interest in DML, and suggest that even they might have a rather naïve view. A change in approach is possible even through a short course (Scull & Kupersmidt, 2011), supporting the view that literacy development is incremental (Hendrix-Soto & Mosley Wetzel, 2018). Throughout the course, teachers maintained a description of their role as a model of competent digital behavior, different from that of an expert or reference person.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 88%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In general, the results confirm pre-service teachers' interest in DML, and suggest that even they might have a rather naïve view. A change in approach is possible even through a short course (Scull & Kupersmidt, 2011), supporting the view that literacy development is incremental (Hendrix-Soto & Mosley Wetzel, 2018). Throughout the course, teachers maintained a description of their role as a model of competent digital behavior, different from that of an expert or reference person.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 88%
“…These two traditions also inform pre-service TE (Hendrix-Soto & Mosley Wetzel, 2018). While they are the main sources of what we understand as the content of DML, Dezuanni (2015) claims that they do not adequately explain how students develop media knowledge in practice, and proposes a four-building-blocks non-hierarchical and non-sequential model for the design of DML curricula: (a) Digital materials, that is, concretely working with hardware, software and media tools; (b) Media analysis; (c) Media Production; and (d) Conceptual understandings.…”
Section: Digital and Media Literacymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Despite the existence of various definitions and operationalization of the concept of critical literacy (López, 2020;Lee, 2011;Yoon et al, 2018), and with distinct theoretical influences-which generates misconceptions and ambiguities (Hearfield & Boughton, 2018;Vasquez, 2017;Luke, 2012;Hendrix-Soto, & Mosley Wetzel, 2018), the concept of critical literacy can, overall, be understood as "a theoretical and practical framework that can readily take on such challenges creating spaces for literacy work that can contribute to creating a more critically informed and just world" (Vasquez, 2017, p. 1). Table 1 depicts the main aspects of critical literacy, as proposed by Vasquez (2017).…”
Section: Critical Literacymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…2, No. 1, 2020 20 Published by SCHOLINK INC.justice, by (i) criticizing the existing social order, translated into the ideology of the present and its institutions of maintenance of that society; and (2) fostering awareness and the need for change in social power relationships(Lee, 2011;Luke, 2012;Hearfield & Boughton, 2018;Hendrix-Soto & Mosley, 2018). Janks (2018) argues that "Ideal readers read with the text; critical readers read against the text.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation