1994
DOI: 10.1177/014920639402000207
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Review of Current Practices for Evaluating Causal Models in Organizational Behavior and Human Resources Management Research

Abstract: This paper reviews the literature on structural model evaluation. It discusses the use of fit indices, the influential work of James, Mulaik, and Brett (19821, with emphasis on their prescriptions for model assessment, and recent developments in model evaluation presented since James et al. It then analyzes current modeling practices to determine how well evaluation techniques are being applied. Although modeling practices have improved since an earlier review (James & James, 19891, several problems remain… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
205
0
2

Year Published

1999
1999
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 547 publications
(210 citation statements)
references
References 60 publications
3
205
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…The study adapted the two-stage approach of assessing the measurement model before the structural model, which has been widely accepted in prior studies (e.g., Medsker, Williams, & Holahan 1994;Zattoni, Gnan, & Huse 2012). Exploratory Factor Analysis (EFA) (i.e., principal axis factoring with Oblique factor rotation) and Confirmatory Factor Analysis (CFA) were first conducted to examine the reliability, validity, and goodness of fit for the measurement model.…”
Section: Overview Of the Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The study adapted the two-stage approach of assessing the measurement model before the structural model, which has been widely accepted in prior studies (e.g., Medsker, Williams, & Holahan 1994;Zattoni, Gnan, & Huse 2012). Exploratory Factor Analysis (EFA) (i.e., principal axis factoring with Oblique factor rotation) and Confirmatory Factor Analysis (CFA) were first conducted to examine the reliability, validity, and goodness of fit for the measurement model.…”
Section: Overview Of the Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Traditionally, two statistics have been used to compare the fit of two nested models: the likelihood-ratio test (LRT) statistic (Neale & Cardon, 1992) and the Akaike information criterion (AIC; Akaike, 1987;Medsker, Williams, & Holahan, 1994). The LRT is obtained by comparing the −2 log-likelihood (−2 LL) of a comparison model to the −2 LL of a nested (reduced) model.…”
Section: Statistical Analysesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Cronbach's Alpha was used to reinforce the construct validity of the selected measures, parameter estimation and model validation tests were conducted, and several indices were www.ieeca.org/journalused to assess the fit of the measurement model (Diamantopoulos and Singuaw, 2000;Medsker et al, 1994). In our analysis, we focused on goodness of fit index (GFI), adjusted GFI (AGFI) (whose values from .85 to .90 are considered acceptable (Medsker et al, 1994)), and non-normed fit index (NNFI), whose values should be close to 1 for a good fit of the model (Diamantopoulos and Singuaw, 2000). We also examined the root mean square error of approximation (RMSEA), which should be below .08 for an acceptable fit (Diamantopoulos and Singuaw, 2000).…”
Section: Pilot Test Of Questionnairementioning
confidence: 99%