2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.earscirev.2021.103781
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A review of Devonian–Carboniferous magmatism in the central region of Argentina, pre-Andean margin of SW Gondwana

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
18
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 39 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 138 publications
1
18
0
Order By: Relevance
“…2), although at least part of the detrital zircon record indicates a more significant localised source region for the northern Antarctic Peninsula. Late Devonian magmatism in southern Patagonia developed in two contemporaneous belts, possibly reflecting double subduction along both a continental margin and island arc setting (Hervé et al, 2013) or a function of subduction slab dynamics (Dahlquist et al, 2021), which is favoured here based on our GPlates kinematic reconstructions. The evolution of the Devonian-Carboniferous magmatism between 27 • and 35 • S is best explained by a segmented tectonic subduction and switch-off and switch-on geodynamic model (push-pull tectonics), including the transition from flatslab to roll-back subduction involving delamination of the upper plate and break-off of the oceanic slab (Dahlquist et al, 2021).…”
Section: Tectonic Settingmentioning
confidence: 76%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…2), although at least part of the detrital zircon record indicates a more significant localised source region for the northern Antarctic Peninsula. Late Devonian magmatism in southern Patagonia developed in two contemporaneous belts, possibly reflecting double subduction along both a continental margin and island arc setting (Hervé et al, 2013) or a function of subduction slab dynamics (Dahlquist et al, 2021), which is favoured here based on our GPlates kinematic reconstructions. The evolution of the Devonian-Carboniferous magmatism between 27 • and 35 • S is best explained by a segmented tectonic subduction and switch-off and switch-on geodynamic model (push-pull tectonics), including the transition from flatslab to roll-back subduction involving delamination of the upper plate and break-off of the oceanic slab (Dahlquist et al, 2021).…”
Section: Tectonic Settingmentioning
confidence: 76%
“…Late Devonian magmatism in southern Patagonia developed in two contemporaneous belts, possibly reflecting double subduction along both a continental margin and island arc setting (Hervé et al, 2013) or a function of subduction slab dynamics (Dahlquist et al, 2021), which is favoured here based on our GPlates kinematic reconstructions. The evolution of the Devonian-Carboniferous magmatism between 27 • and 35 • S is best explained by a segmented tectonic subduction and switch-off and switch-on geodynamic model (push-pull tectonics), including the transition from flatslab to roll-back subduction involving delamination of the upper plate and break-off of the oceanic slab (Dahlquist et al, 2021). Ramos (2008) suggested that two coeval magmatic arcs; a western belt broadly parallel to the present continental margin that was active from the Late Silurian to the mid-Carboniferous and a southern magmatic arc that eventually led to the collision of Patagonia with southwest Gondwana.…”
Section: Tectonic Settingmentioning
confidence: 76%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The term Famatinian orogeny was coined by Aceñolaza & Toselli (1976) and is retained here because it is rooted in the geological literature (e.g. Astini & Dávila, 2004; Ramos, 2018; Rapela et al 2018; Weinberg et al 2018; Otamendi et al 2020; Dahlquist et al 2021; Alasino et al 2022). However, the timespan of the Famatinian orogeny has been progressively restricted (e.g.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%