A Review of Disaster Trend and Disaster Risk Governance in Indonesia: 1900–2015

Djalante, Riyanti; Garschagen, Matthias

doi:10.1007/978-3-319-54466-3_2

Cited by 43 publications

(33 citation statements)

References 79 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…Dalam konsep Penanggulangan Bencana Berbasis Komunitas atau PBBK (PRBK), masyarakat merupakan kunci utama yang secara aktif, partisipatif dan terorganisir dengan baik dapat melakukan serangkaian upaya atau kegiatan untuk meminalisir kerentanan bencana. Dengan partisipasi aktif masyarakat ini diharapkan mampu mengidentifikasi dan mengerti potensi wilayah mereka, memetakan berbagai potensi bahaya di wilayah mereka, juga mengetahui potensi sumber daya lokal yang ada (Djalante & Garschagen, 2017).…”

Section: Hasil Dan Pembahasanunclassified

Partisipasi dan Pemberdayaan Sumber Daya Lokal Sebagai Upaya Pengurangan Risiko Bencana Berbasis Komunitas di Pidie Jaya Aceh Guna Mendukung Keamanan Nasional

Januarti

Rachmatika

Winugroho

et al. 2021

pendipa. jurnal. pendik. sains

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Participation and Empowerment of Local Resources as Community-Based Disaster Risk ReductionEfforts in Pidie Jaya Aceh to Support National Security]. Pidie Jaya District, Aceh Province has geographical conditions that include coastal and mountainous areas as well as the Great Sumatran Fault that stretches from Lampung to the Andaman Sea. This situation makes Pidie Jaya an area prone to disaster risk. Disaster Risk Reduction (DRR) can be a strategy in an effort to reduce vulnerability and increase capacity in disaster-prone areas. This study aimed to analyze community-based DRR efforts (CBDRM) which include participation and empowerment of local resources in the community in creating independence in Pidie Jaya District. The subjects in this study were the people of Pidie Jaya Regency. The method used in this research was descriptive qualitative using data sourced from interview data and documentation. Research results from the triangulation process show that the participation and empowerment of the people of Pidie Jaya Regency in Community-Based Disaster Risk Reduction efforts is still not running optimally, but it has increased understanding of disaster science in the area including knowledge, culture, anticipation, and mitigation. The principle of Building Back Better is implemented by the Government of Pidie Jaya, namely by reconstructing the lives of community groups through reducing vulnerability and increasing the ability to avoid risk factors for future disasters. Approaches through religious and dayah leaders take part in providing outreach and education. The result of CBDRM Pidie Jaya is the establishment of two Disaster Resilient Villages / Gampong located in the coastal area, namely Desa Lancang Kec. Bandar Baru and Desa Meuraksa district of Meureudu.

show abstract

Section: Hasil Dan Pembahasanunclassified

Partisipasi dan Pemberdayaan Sumber Daya Lokal Sebagai Upaya Pengurangan Risiko Bencana Berbasis Komunitas di Pidie Jaya Aceh Guna Mendukung Keamanan Nasional

Januarti

Rachmatika

Winugroho

et al. 2021

pendipa. jurnal. pendik. sains

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Past public responses to crises also had institutional dimensions. To coordinate the 2004 Indian Ocean tsunami emergency management, Indonesia formed the Tsunami Rehabilitation and Reconstruction Board (Djalante and Garschagen, 2017, p. 43). After the 2011 Tohoku earthquake and tsunami to coordinate and promote the rebuilding and revitalization of the damaged Japanese regions a reconstruction agency was established (Kingston, 2016, p. 377).…”

Section: Findings: Disaster Regulatory Experience Regulatory Institutions and Overregulationmentioning

confidence: 99%

Regulation in the COVID-19 pandemic and post-pandemic times: day-watchman tackling the novel coronavirus

Sokołowski

2020

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Purpose While fighting with the novel coronavirus will not be the main goal of sectoral regulators, different regulatory authorities join the struggle by providing a regulatory response. The purpose of this paper is to address this regulatory response in pandemic gathered around eight thematic areas. Design/methodology/approach This paper discusses the regulatory response in pandemic gathered around eight thematic areas, namely, the objectives, rules and standards, authorization and permits, procedure, monitoring and surveillance, enforcement, accountability and an institution presenting regulatory actions to tackle coronavirus (COVID-19) in reference to day-watchman type regulation. Findings Tackling the COVID-19 pandemic should be a knowledge-based approach (taking as much as possible from best available practices with respect to the novel coronavirus) with a framework of rules, standards, authorization, permits and guidance, monitored and enforced in a way adjusted to conditions of the pandemic, being as safe (as non-physical, as online) as possible, with suspended or extended deadlines, free of unnecessary administrative burdens. In this way, regulation should be pragmatic and flexible, as under the day-watchman model. Research limitations/implications In a post-pandemic regime, in the short run, the regulators should try to minimize the social and economic challenges faced by consumers and entrepreneurs. Among them, one may find scaling back, at least temporarily, the rules developed in non-disaster contexts. However, in the end, the post-disaster reforms tended to strengthen regulators’ hands, also under the deregulated government. The day-watchman type regulation balances both, as a middle ground approach, being a bridge between “a total subordination” and “a complete release.” Practical implications The disaster management (including public law regulation) provided by public authorities when tackling the effects of hurricanes, earthquakes or tsunamis can be a benchmark for regulatory responses to the COVID-19 pandemic. This concerns the support offered to entities and individuals affected by the negative consequences of reducing or stopping their businesses and staying in isolation. Social implications The day-watchman approach, visible in certain examples of public response to COVID-19 may serve as a framework for establishing a regulatory regime that would automatically take effect in case of another pandemic, limiting delays in regulatory actions, reducing non-compliance and accelerating recovery. Originality/value This study provides an analysis of different theories on public regulation addressing the notion of regulation using the day-watchman theory, which could be applied in regulatory actions during a pandemic. The paper discusses concrete steps taken by regulatory authorities worldwide, bringing examples from the USA, Canada, the UK, France, China, Japan, Australia and New Zealand. It juxtaposes the regulatory experiences derived from different catastrophes such as hurricanes, earthquakes or tsunamis with the regulatory response in a pandemic.

show abstract

“…The law underpins inter alia the collaboration between the government, civil society and the private sector on disaster risk reduction (Izumi and Shaw, 2015). Although, Indonesia has achieved a considerable progress regarding disaster management policy and the government implemented joint activities with international organizations and NGOs to integrate the community, the business sector has mostly been neglected (Djalante and Garschagen, 2017).…”

Section: Indonesian Coastal Cities' Exposure To Floods -The Examples mentioning

confidence: 99%

Firms as drivers of integrative adaptive regional development in the context of environmental hazards in developing countries and emerging economies – A conceptual framework

Neise

Diez

Garschagen

2018

Environment and Planning C: Politics and Space

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Many industrial sites in developing countries and emerging economies face increasing exposure to environmental hazards, e.g. in coastal locations, while being situated within the territory of state authorities which lack in capacity to provide adaptation solutions. It is therefore relevant to ask, whether and how firms engage in adaptation, both individually and collectively, in order to reduce business disruptions, enhance their competitiveness and shape regional development. However, the literature has made little efforts to address these questions conceptually and empirically. The paper therefore develops a heuristic conceptual framework for deciphering the decision-making of firms exposed to environmental hazards and the role that they might play for shaping larger risk governance and eventually regional adaptation. In doing so, the paper builds on both an explorative empirical study in Jakarta and Semarang and the assessment of different literatures of relevance to the topic. The proposed framework argues that firms potentially fulfill a twofold role in shaping integrative adaptive regional development when exposed to environmental hazards. First, firms seek to enhance their own competitiveness through adjustments which are determined by their routines, risk behavior and the institutional setting. Second, firms act as stakeholders within broader collective adaptation. In conclusion, the framework suggests that firms’ (in-)actions can shift the trajectories of regional development into different directions, along a gradient from collapse, resistance, resilience to transformation. The framework can be used to guide empirical analysis and inspire policy making and practice of integrated adaptation governance, especially in rapidly changing developing countries and emerging economies.

show abstract

A Review of Disaster Trend and Disaster Risk Governance in Indonesia: 1900–2015

Cited by 43 publications

References 79 publications

Partisipasi dan Pemberdayaan Sumber Daya Lokal Sebagai Upaya Pengurangan Risiko Bencana Berbasis Komunitas di Pidie Jaya Aceh Guna Mendukung Keamanan Nasional

Partisipasi dan Pemberdayaan Sumber Daya Lokal Sebagai Upaya Pengurangan Risiko Bencana Berbasis Komunitas di Pidie Jaya Aceh Guna Mendukung Keamanan Nasional

Regulation in the COVID-19 pandemic and post-pandemic times: day-watchman tackling the novel coronavirus

Firms as drivers of integrative adaptive regional development in the context of environmental hazards in developing countries and emerging economies – A conceptual framework

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About