2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.ejmp.2020.06.017
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A review of dose calculation approaches with cone beam CT in photon and proton therapy

Abstract: Background and purpose: The use of cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) for performing dose calculations in radiation therapy has been widely investigated as it could provide a quantitative analysis of the dosimetric impact of changes in patients during the treatment. The aim of this review was to classify different techniques adopted to perform CBCT dose calculation and to report their dosimetric accuracy with respect to the metrics used. Methods and materials: A literature search was carried out in PubMed an… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

3
66
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 69 publications
(69 citation statements)
references
References 123 publications
(301 reference statements)
3
66
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A CBCT possesses image artifacts due to detector scatter, patient specific scatter, image lag and beam hardening, making dose calculations prone to errors. Many calibration approaches for accurate dose calculations on CBCT currently exist [10]: Patient-or population-specific CT number to electron density calibration (CT-ED-calibration) [11], bulk density override [12], image processing algorithms that further improve the image quality [13][14][15] or deformable image registration (DIR) [7,8] between the CBCT and the treatment planning CT (pCT) to create a deformed CT or a deformed dose in order to assess anatomical and dosimetric changes [16,17]. Recently, deep learning (DL) approaches gained popularity since they can be custom tailored to individual treatment components like image processing and can substantially accelerate time-consuming workflow steps in ART [18,19].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A CBCT possesses image artifacts due to detector scatter, patient specific scatter, image lag and beam hardening, making dose calculations prone to errors. Many calibration approaches for accurate dose calculations on CBCT currently exist [10]: Patient-or population-specific CT number to electron density calibration (CT-ED-calibration) [11], bulk density override [12], image processing algorithms that further improve the image quality [13][14][15] or deformable image registration (DIR) [7,8] between the CBCT and the treatment planning CT (pCT) to create a deformed CT or a deformed dose in order to assess anatomical and dosimetric changes [16,17]. Recently, deep learning (DL) approaches gained popularity since they can be custom tailored to individual treatment components like image processing and can substantially accelerate time-consuming workflow steps in ART [18,19].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In recent years, the introduction of new advanced techniques of IGRT using online cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) allows the tracking of daily positioning and anatomical changes of patients in treatment position. It also has the potential to be used to evaluate the dose-of-the-day distributions in comparison to the dose distribution calculated on the planning computed tomography (pCT) ( 3 ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…X-ray medical imaging has undergone tremendous technological advances for the diagnosis and treatment of a breadth of examinations and procedures [1]. In particular, due to its rich and robust image information and shorter examination time [2][3][4][5], conebeam computed tomography (CBCT) has become standard in recent clinical applications as adaptive radiotherapy treatment [6], image-guided radiation therapy (IGRT) [6][7][8][9][10][11][12], maxillofacial applications [13][14][15], cone-beam breast tomography (CBBCT) [16][17][18][19][20][21][22][23], or proton computed tomography for particle therapy [24][25][26][27][28]. CBCT is a new technology using a cone-shaped beam and a detector that rotate 360 • around the patient, able to acquire projected data in a single rotation [29].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%