2007
DOI: 10.1088/0967-3334/28/7/s15
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A review of errors in multi-frequency EIT instrumentation

Abstract: Multi-frequency electrical impedance tomography (MFEIT) was proposed over 10 years ago as a potential spectroscopic impedance imaging method. At least seven systems have been developed for imaging the lung, heart, breast and brain, yet none has yet achieved clinical acceptance. While the absolute impedance varies considerably between different tissues, the changes in the spectrum due to physiological changes are expected to be quite small, especially when measured through a volume. This places substantial requ… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
89
0
2

Year Published

2008
2008
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 131 publications
(92 citation statements)
references
References 54 publications
1
89
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…MHz [10]- [15]. In these methods, current is either injected into the body by surface electrodes (EIT), or induced in the body using external coils (MIT), and data is measured either on the surface of the body or outside the body.…”
Section: Motivationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…MHz [10]- [15]. In these methods, current is either injected into the body by surface electrodes (EIT), or induced in the body using external coils (MIT), and data is measured either on the surface of the body or outside the body.…”
Section: Motivationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Absolute imaging is theoretically possible, but is computationally intensive and very sensitive to errors resulting from inaccurate boundary geometry, electrode positions and other sources of systematic artefacts in measured data (McEwan et al, 2007;Seo et al, 2008). The simple frequency-difference method, which reconstructs the EIT images from relative data referred to a certain frequency using a linear method, was proven that it can work in a homogeneous and frequency invariant background (Packham et al, 2012).…”
Section: Mfeit Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As such, MFEIT offers a potential solution, as images can be produced from data collected at a single given point in time. However, MFEIT application is more challenging due to the high sensitivity of its solution to modelling and instrumentation errors (Kolehmainen et al, 1997;McEwan et al, 2007;Malone et al, 2014b) .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…predictability of constant current with the noise advantages, the current source are commonly employed on EIS systems as is utilized by Kyung Hee (IIRC & Mk1); Oxford Brookes (OXBACT5); Rensselaer (ACT4); Sheffield (Mk3.5); UCL (Mk2.5&1b) and also the Leicester group (Mk3) [1][2][3][4][5][6][7] . The enhancement of the EIS system focuses on developing electrical and electronic instrumentations to improve the accuracy of the transfer impedance measurements to make them operate up to high frequency for the purpose of measuring impedivity and conductivity of different tissues types [8][9][10] . The transfer impedance measurement is the ratio between current injections and voltage measurements obtained from the subject under test or a biological tissue sample to images the distribution of impedivity.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%