2011
DOI: 10.1016/j.renene.2011.05.013
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A review of European standards for pellet quality

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
87
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 133 publications
(88 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
1
87
0
Order By: Relevance
“…1b) were superior to those obtained by García-Maraver et al (2010) for pellets made from olive tree branches. It may be inferred from this comparison that having an adequate force at break value allows pellets to maintain their shape during transportation (Kaliyan and Morey 2009).…”
Section: Mechanical Propertiesmentioning
confidence: 68%
“…1b) were superior to those obtained by García-Maraver et al (2010) for pellets made from olive tree branches. It may be inferred from this comparison that having an adequate force at break value allows pellets to maintain their shape during transportation (Kaliyan and Morey 2009).…”
Section: Mechanical Propertiesmentioning
confidence: 68%
“…Orlov [26] presents domestic consumption of 150 000 tons of pellets, which is 15% of the total production in 2011 (see Table 1). In the most favorable forecasts, the consumption of wood pellets in Russia by 2015 will be 350 000 tons [47]. This figure seems impossible based on the current situation of the Russian pellet industry.…”
Section: Domestic Demand For Wood Pelletsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…End-consumers are mainly interested in the energy content of the pellets, the emissions generated by pellet combustion and the effects of the use of pellets in boilers and stoves [47].…”
Section: Standardsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Prior to the implementation of the ENplus Certification System in 2011, European, Canadian, and US pellet-producing companies had significant variation in official country quality standards and guidelines [41][42][43]. We found only a few publications about pellet certification (Figure 2), presumably because of the lack of guideline cohesiveness and only recent development of the ENplus system.…”
Section: Enplus Certificationmentioning
confidence: 99%