2010
DOI: 10.5120/710-998
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Review of Fault Tolerant Checkpointing Protocols for Mobile Computing Systems

Abstract: A distributed system is a collection of independent entities that cooperate to solve a problem that cannot be individually solved. A mobile computing system is a distributed system where some of processes are running on mobile hosts (MHs), whose location in the network changes with time. Mobile distributed systems raise new issues such as mobility, low bandwidth of wireless channels, disconnections, limited battery power and lack of reliable stable storage on mobile nodes. This paper addresses the problem of f… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
3
1

Relationship

1
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 77 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In this context, we can classify faults as either transient or permanent [7]. Transient faults usually affect communication links between devices for a short time (on the millisecond scale [8]) and are caused by noise or electromagnetic inter ference.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this context, we can classify faults as either transient or permanent [7]. Transient faults usually affect communication links between devices for a short time (on the millisecond scale [8]) and are caused by noise or electromagnetic inter ference.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They have captured the transitive dependencies during the normal execution by piggybacking checkpoint sequence numbers onto normal computation messages. Garg and Kumar (2010) proposed a nonblocking coordinated checkpointing protocol for mobile distributed systems, where only minimum numbers of processes are required to commit the checkpoints. They have reduced the message complexity as compared to the algorithm proposed by Cao and Singhal (2001) algorithm, while keeping the number of useless checkpoints unchanged.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%