2021
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-030-65820-5_15
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Review of Geometrical Interface Properties for 3D Front-Tracking Methods

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
1
1

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…with σ the surface tension coefficient, κ the curvature and n the normal vector of the interface. The surface tension force on a triangulated front element E can be computed by using the Frenet-Element method given as [4,13,15]…”
Section: Rising Bubblementioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…with σ the surface tension coefficient, κ the curvature and n the normal vector of the interface. The surface tension force on a triangulated front element E can be computed by using the Frenet-Element method given as [4,13,15]…”
Section: Rising Bubblementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The major advantage arising from the explicit representation of the interface is the straightforward computation of the normal vector at each point on the interface and, particularly, of the curvature of the interface for the calculation of the surface tension force. In the works of Tryggvason et al [13] as well as Shin et al [14], the surface tension force is evaluated as a triangle or vertex centered value by a Frenet-Element or Frenet-Vertex method [15]. Further possible computational methods for the curvature are given, for instance, by Todd and McLeod [16], Meyer et al [17] as well as de Sousa et al [18].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%