2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.cvfa.2021.03.010
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Review of Global Prevalence and Economic Impacts of Infectious Bovine Keratoconjunctivitis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…According to the conclusion of a number of researchers, IBK is one of the infections that cause the greatest economic damage to livestock (Brown et al, 1998;Prieto et al, 2013;Postma et al, 2008;Dennis et al, 2021). In the last decade in Kazakhstan, the number of cases of IBK has increased, which are primarily associated with the import of highly productive animals, the infection rate reaches 27% (Ivanov et al, 2021).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…According to the conclusion of a number of researchers, IBK is one of the infections that cause the greatest economic damage to livestock (Brown et al, 1998;Prieto et al, 2013;Postma et al, 2008;Dennis et al, 2021). In the last decade in Kazakhstan, the number of cases of IBK has increased, which are primarily associated with the import of highly productive animals, the infection rate reaches 27% (Ivanov et al, 2021).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Infectious bovine keratoconjunctivitis (IBK), also known as pinkeye, is the most common ocular disease that affects cattle with an estimated worldwide prevalence of 2.8% in beef cattle [1,2]. IBK is a complex disease that is influenced by multiple factors involving primarily bacterial pathogens, the environment, and the host [1][2][3][4].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…IBK is both an animal welfare and production loss concern, as it is painful and affected cattle can have reduced weight gain [6,7]. Economic impacts have been insufficiently studied but costs in the US alone likely are in the hundreds of millions of dollars each year [1]. The only antibiotics with label approval for IBK treatment in the US are oxytetracycline and tulathromycin, which raises concerns for increased frequencies of bacteria with antimicrobial resistance (AMR) to these antibiotics in cattle [8][9][10].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recently, an epidemiological case definition was proposed for IBK that included; a disease with high morbidity (at least 2% in calves or 0.6% in adult animals) that rapidly disseminates within a herd (average time course of 30 days), with animals displaying clinical signs that are restricted to the eye(s) to include keratitis and/or conjunctivitis, with at least 10% of the lesions displaying corneal ulceration [4]. IBK has a significant economic impact on the cattle industry due to the need for antibiotics, labor required for carrying out treatments, decreased feed efficiency, decreased average daily gain, costs associated with prevention strategies, and animal welfare concerns [1,5,6].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%