2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.earscirev.2020.103085
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A review of Hadean to Neoarchean crust generation in the Singhbhum Craton, India and possible connection with Pilbara Craton, Australia: The geochronological perspective

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
14
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 41 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 101 publications
3
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Documentation of Kumar et al (2017) is very important in the sense that during Neoarchean time, Singhbhum Craton was proximal to Pilbara and Kaapvaal Craton and therefore they altogether could define the Vaalbara LIP. Role of Neoarchean crust‐generation in the Singhbhum Craton has also been highlighted by Chaudhuri (2020) and this work also suggests a possible Pilbara connection of Singhbhum. The granite‐greenstone belts containing banded iron formation (BIF) of the Gorumahisani‐Badampahar‐Daitari Iron Ore Group (IOG) comprises an integral part of the Archean granite greenstone terranes and Proterozoic supracrustals of the Singhbhum Craton (Manikyamba et al, 2015; Mohanty, 2012).…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 75%
“…Documentation of Kumar et al (2017) is very important in the sense that during Neoarchean time, Singhbhum Craton was proximal to Pilbara and Kaapvaal Craton and therefore they altogether could define the Vaalbara LIP. Role of Neoarchean crust‐generation in the Singhbhum Craton has also been highlighted by Chaudhuri (2020) and this work also suggests a possible Pilbara connection of Singhbhum. The granite‐greenstone belts containing banded iron formation (BIF) of the Gorumahisani‐Badampahar‐Daitari Iron Ore Group (IOG) comprises an integral part of the Archean granite greenstone terranes and Proterozoic supracrustals of the Singhbhum Craton (Manikyamba et al, 2015; Mohanty, 2012).…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 75%
“…The older ages (3,101, 3,280–3,460 Ma) correspond well with ages obtained from different phases of Singhbhum Granite and the OMTG. (Figure 2; reviews in Acharyya et al, 2010a; Chakraborti et al, 2019; Chaudhuri, 2020; Mazumder, van Loon, et al, 2012; Mishra et al, 1999; Misra, 2006; Mukhopadhyay & Matin, 2020; Pandey et al, 2019; Saha, 1994; Upadhyay et al, 2014, 2019). Widespread granitoid emplacement events are reported from the margins of the Singhbhum Craton at around 2,700–2,800 Ma, for example, Tamperkola Granite (ca.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…The Singhbhum Craton of eastern India (Figure 2) preserves a long stratigraphic history of crustal evolution from Palaeoarchean to terminal Mesoproterozoic (summarized in Table 2; see for reviews Chaudhuri, 2020; Mazumdar, 1996; Mazumder, Eriksson et al,2012; Misra, 2006; Mukhopadhyay, 2001; Mukhopadhyay et al, 2008, Mukhopadhyay, Crowley et al, 2014; Mukhopadhyay & Matin, 2020; Olierook et al, 2019; Sarkar, Gupta, & Basu, 1992; Saha, 1994; Upadhyay et al, 2014). The core of the craton comprises Palaeo‐Mesoarchean TTG plutons (the Older Metamorphic Tonalitic Gneiss, known as the Older Metamorphic Tonalite Gneiss (OMTG), and Singhbhum‐Bonai Granites, known as the SBG), BIF‐bearing greenstone belts collectively termed as the Iron Ore Group (IOG), metasedimentary and metavolcanic enclaves of the Older Metamorphic Group (OMG; Hofmann & Mazumder, 2015; Manikyamba et al, 2015; Saha, 1994) and the Mesoarchean siliciclastic successions (Mahagiri‐Keonjhar‐Mankharchua quartzites; De, 2019; Ghosh, De, & Mukhopadhyay, 2016; Mukhopadhyay, Crowley et al, 2014).…”
Section: Geology Of the Singhbhum Cratonmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Crustal formation in the craton possibly started as early as in the Hadean and got subsequently remobilized till the end of the Palaeoarchean. It is characterized by extensive occurrences of Palaeoarchean to Mesoarchean TTG crust (Dey et al, 2017; Nelson et al, 2014; Pandey et al, 2019; Upadhyay et al, 2014), and almost complete record of crustal formation from Palaeoarchean to Palaeoproterozoic can be seen preserved here (Chaudhuri, 2020; Dey et al, 2019; Dey & Moyen, 2020). This includes the oldest granitoids consisting of gneisses that belong to the Older Metamorphic Tonalite Gneiss (OMTG) suite, which is currently being referred to as Champua suite (Dey et al, 2017).…”
Section: Geological Settingsmentioning
confidence: 90%