1996
DOI: 10.1007/bf01761831
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A review of handwriting research: Progress and prospects from 1980 to 1994

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

10
259
2
37

Year Published

2006
2006
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 306 publications
(308 citation statements)
references
References 162 publications
10
259
2
37
Order By: Relevance
“…As such, the faster the writing speed, the better the spelling and text performance. This observation concurs with Graham and Weintraub (1996) who note that when writing speed is not fast enough, children forget their ideas before they can write them, which, in turn, has a negative impact on text production. By writing faster, children thus appear to automate the graphomotor aspect of spelling information, which is a crucial element in the development of writing skills (Berninger & Swanson, 1994).…”
Section: Discussion Graphomotor Skills and Written Productionsupporting
confidence: 89%
“…As such, the faster the writing speed, the better the spelling and text performance. This observation concurs with Graham and Weintraub (1996) who note that when writing speed is not fast enough, children forget their ideas before they can write them, which, in turn, has a negative impact on text production. By writing faster, children thus appear to automate the graphomotor aspect of spelling information, which is a crucial element in the development of writing skills (Berninger & Swanson, 1994).…”
Section: Discussion Graphomotor Skills and Written Productionsupporting
confidence: 89%
“…Should this not be the case, achievement deficits might accumulate. In addition to the direct effects that deficits in fine motor skills have on achievement (Graham, 1990;Graham and Weintraub, 1996) one may also expect indirect effects. Besides the effects examined in Stoeger et al (2008) concerning attention and the effects concerning persistence described in this study, additional implications can be expected.…”
Section: Discussion and Implications For Practicementioning
confidence: 99%
“…O critério B especifica que esse diagnóstico só é pertinente se as dificuldades motoras (critério A), sem adaptação, têm impacto no desempenho acadêmico. Avaliar a escrita é especialmente importante, pois é uma das metas de intervenção mais frequentes para essas crianças 6 já que a dificuldade de escrita manual pode prejudicar o desempenho acadêmico, com impacto na autoestima, nas relações pessoais e nas percepções da criança e dos outros acerca de suas habilidades 7 . Face à dificuldade de acesso a testes importados e à ausência de avaliação motora padronizada para crianças brasileiras, principalmente testes que englobam todos os critérios diagnósticos para o TDC, foi criada a Avaliação da Coordenação e Destreza Manual (ACOORDEM) 8 .…”
Section: Introductionunclassified