1996
DOI: 10.1016/0026-2714(96)00022-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A review of hot-carrier degradation mechanisms in MOSFETs

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
66
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
3

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 101 publications
(67 citation statements)
references
References 93 publications
1
66
0
Order By: Relevance
“…They become highly energized and should be accelerated away from their normal directional flow. These highly energized electrons may create interface states by breaking silicon bonds [19] or be injected into generated surface traps (hot electron injection) at interface between gate oxide and N À LDD overlap area beneath SiO 2 layer. The trapped electrons reduce the electric charge density and therefore the total charge in the area affected by the trapped carriers.…”
Section: Evolution Of C Iss C Oss and C Rss After Ageingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They become highly energized and should be accelerated away from their normal directional flow. These highly energized electrons may create interface states by breaking silicon bonds [19] or be injected into generated surface traps (hot electron injection) at interface between gate oxide and N À LDD overlap area beneath SiO 2 layer. The trapped electrons reduce the electric charge density and therefore the total charge in the area affected by the trapped carriers.…”
Section: Evolution Of C Iss C Oss and C Rss After Ageingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is due to the bombardment by carriers which have gained sufficiently high energy and are thus called ''hot" carriers (see [1] and references therein). These interface states, characterized by a density N it , are able to capture charge carriers and, hence, become charged.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…5. Basically, the doping dosage at the S/D extension zone (P SDE ) is less than the S/D implant (P + ) around one tenth, compared with the lightly-doped drain implant (P − ) before 110 nm node process (normally, P + /P − > 10) to reduce the hot-carrier effect (HCE) [19][20][21][22]. Owing to this effort, the series resistance in channel is decreased and the ON current is possibly increased.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%