2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.jallcom.2022.163964
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A review of hot deformation behavior and constitutive models to predict flow stress of high-entropy alloys

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
54
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 174 publications
(54 citation statements)
references
References 177 publications
0
54
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Therefore, in [29,30], it is proposed in Expression (2) to use stresses normalized to the shear modulus (σ m /G) or Young's modulus (σ m /E) instead of stresses σ m . In this case, the activation energy drops to the value of the activation energy of self-diffusion, and the value of the exponent n close to 5, according to some authors, will indicate that the mechanism that controls hot deformation is glide and climb of dislocations [31,32]. However, at present, the precise expressions for the temperature dependence of elastic moduli are not known for all materials.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…Therefore, in [29,30], it is proposed in Expression (2) to use stresses normalized to the shear modulus (σ m /G) or Young's modulus (σ m /E) instead of stresses σ m . In this case, the activation energy drops to the value of the activation energy of self-diffusion, and the value of the exponent n close to 5, according to some authors, will indicate that the mechanism that controls hot deformation is glide and climb of dislocations [31,32]. However, at present, the precise expressions for the temperature dependence of elastic moduli are not known for all materials.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…It is well known that the magnitude of the activation energy Q reflects the degree of deformation difficulty for plasticity deformation and the thermodynamic mechanism of dislocation movement [ 21 , 49 ]. The activation energy of deformation Q for the studied alloy is 177.3 kJ·mol −1 at a strain of 0.69, which is higher than that of common Al-Zn-Mg-Cu alloys [ 21 , 50 ].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The self-diffusion activation energies for Al, Zn, Mg, Li, and Cu are 142, 102, 134, 55, and 197 kJ·mol −1 , respectively [ 51 ]. Therefore, the self-diffusion activation energy value obtained by weighted mean according to its content [ 49 ] is 137.3 kJ·mol −1 . The experimental activation energy is higher than the weighted mean self-diffusion activation energy and the self-diffusion activation energy for Al.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For its great algorithm to solve the problem of nonlinear regression and excellent prediction accuracy of material rheological behavior, machine learning provided a new idea and method for the establishment of material constitutive models. The current machine learning models for flow stress prediction include artificial neural network [15][16][17][18][19], support vector machine regression [20,21] and K-nearest neighbor regression [22], etc.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%