2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2015.10.018
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A review of intrinsic self-healing capability of engineered cementitious composites: Recovery of transport and mechanical properties

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
37
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 148 publications
(37 citation statements)
references
References 49 publications
0
37
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Cracking age was reported to have a vital impact on the self-healing of concrete or composite with the 18 high proportion of cement and supplementary cementitious materials (SCMs) such as fly ash, slag 19 based Engineered Cementitious Composites (ECCs) [6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13]. Two different types of fly ash (low lime 20 and high lime) and ground granulated blast furnace slag (GGBS) about 1.2 times of PC in ECC were 21 pre-damaged to 80% of the their deformed capacities at 7, 28 and 90 days, and their self-healing 22 performance based on sorptivity and rapid chloride permeability tests (RCPT) showed decreasing 23 healing trend with the increase in pre-damage age [9,10]. The self-healing of these fly ash and GGBS 24 based ECCs was reported less effective when composites aged to maturity [11][12][13], although the use 25 of hydrated lime [12] and CO 2 -water curing [13] in ECCs reported to enhanced the healing efficiency.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Cracking age was reported to have a vital impact on the self-healing of concrete or composite with the 18 high proportion of cement and supplementary cementitious materials (SCMs) such as fly ash, slag 19 based Engineered Cementitious Composites (ECCs) [6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13]. Two different types of fly ash (low lime 20 and high lime) and ground granulated blast furnace slag (GGBS) about 1.2 times of PC in ECC were 21 pre-damaged to 80% of the their deformed capacities at 7, 28 and 90 days, and their self-healing 22 performance based on sorptivity and rapid chloride permeability tests (RCPT) showed decreasing 23 healing trend with the increase in pre-damage age [9,10]. The self-healing of these fly ash and GGBS 24 based ECCs was reported less effective when composites aged to maturity [11][12][13], although the use 25 of hydrated lime [12] and CO 2 -water curing [13] in ECCs reported to enhanced the healing efficiency.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This suggests that even when cracked as a result of restrained shrinkage, HPFRC mixtures are very likely to stay durable and keep their integrity upon exposure to severe environmental conditioning. Smaller crack widths are also known to favor autogenous self‐healing of concrete material without external interference . According to Clear, to achieve an increased self‐healing efficiency, crack widths should be less than 300 μm level.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Given the materials' enhanced performance, many studies have focused on their basic mechanical and durability properties . Due to the crack bearing ability and controlled cracking behavior of HPFRCs, their self‐healing behavior has also been studied extensively . However, studies into more complex material properties such as resistance to impact loading are lacking in the current literature.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%