2019
DOI: 10.1111/jphp.12831
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A review of issues of nomenclature and taxonomy of Hypericum perforatum L. and Kew's Medicinal Plant Names Services

Abstract: Objectives To review which names are used to refer to Hypericum perforatum L. in health regulation and medicinal plant references, and the potential for ambiguity or imprecision.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
13
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
0
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For example, H. perforatum L. is confirmed as the accepted name and attribution with the highest quality rating for confidence in the taxonomy, and three illegitimate scientific synonyms are noted. Issues around the nomenclature of H. perforatum subspecies are discussed in a separate MPNS publication [ 33 ]. There are 142 nonscientific names listed with the corresponding medicinal plant reference sources.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…For example, H. perforatum L. is confirmed as the accepted name and attribution with the highest quality rating for confidence in the taxonomy, and three illegitimate scientific synonyms are noted. Issues around the nomenclature of H. perforatum subspecies are discussed in a separate MPNS publication [ 33 ]. There are 142 nonscientific names listed with the corresponding medicinal plant reference sources.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The large number of H. perforatum ITS sequences also allowed consistent sites of intraspecific variation to be identified ( Figure S1 ) [ 12 ]. Four subspecies of H. perforatum are recognized by Robson ( perforatum , chinense , veronense and songaricum ) [ 29 ] but are rarely recorded in the published literature or database accessions [ 33 ]. Molecular phylogenetic studies have characterized two distinct gene pools in European H. perforatum populations, though their relationship to the subspecies is not clear [ 63 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In general, it is a licensed drug in many European countries and in the United Kingdom it is registered under the THR scheme. While considerable effort has gone into understanding the chemistry and pharmacology of commercially used materials, little attention has been paid to the biological and chemical complexity of the starting material and specifically to the diversity within the taxon H. perforatum (Dauncey et al, 2017). HP could be considered as an umbrella term for different Hypericum taxa united by the use as herbal medicines esp.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Robson (2002) proposed the distinction of four subspecies, based on minor morphological traits and with a well-defined geographical distribution of two of these subspecies, while the two Central/Western subspecies overlap through a large range of their territories (Dauncey et al, 2017).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the importance of this is often overlooked, and the use of imprecise or incorrect plant names is ubiquitous in published literature. The complexities of searching the scientific literature for publications on botanical species, and the importance of botanical nomenclature and taxonomy in this endeavour are tackled by Dauncey et al using H. perforatum as an example. Their position paper illustrates the necessity for researchers to be familiar with the full range of names used to describe a particular species to ensure relevant information is not missed; likewise, to achieve maximum impact when communicating their own research, authors should refer to the current accepted scientific name, scientific synonyms and non‐scientific names as far as possible.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%