2020
DOI: 10.1108/wjstsd-06-2020-0062
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A review of learning theories and models underpinning technology-enhanced learning artefacts

Abstract: PurposeVarious technology-enhanced learning software and tools exist where technology becomes the main driver for these developments at the expense of pedagogy. The literature reveals the missing balance between technology and pedagogy in the continuously evolving technology-enhanced learning domain. Consequently, e-learners struggle to realise the pedagogical value of such e-learning artefacts. This paper aims to understand the different pedagogical theories, models and frameworks underpinning current technol… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Learners can make use of their cognitive abilities to practice and construct the learning process through social interactions with internal and external communities. So, this hybrid approach to learning is the result of complementary rather than opposing pedagogical approaches (Hammad et al, 2020). That is to say, pedagogical learning theories should not be implemented in isolation in the learning environment as they rather complement each other while catering for various skills' development.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Learners can make use of their cognitive abilities to practice and construct the learning process through social interactions with internal and external communities. So, this hybrid approach to learning is the result of complementary rather than opposing pedagogical approaches (Hammad et al, 2020). That is to say, pedagogical learning theories should not be implemented in isolation in the learning environment as they rather complement each other while catering for various skills' development.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Even though connectivism fails to add to the principles of the existing learning theories through the explanation of the process of learning within technology, it is still the first attempt to reconsider the effects of technology on learning (Hammad et al, 2020). Learning theories fail to recognize the external dimension of learning as it is guided by technology and how it happens within organizations (Siemens, 2005).…”
Section: Connectivismmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…These learning theories and associated constructs, outdated by advances in learning technologies, often require revisits to consider emerging educational methods and technologies (Hammad et al, 2020). In exploring the effect of VR technology on learning, Makransky and Petersen (2019) identified two learning paths, affective and cognitive learning, where the learning process is more closely linked with VR features than their usability.…”
Section: Theoretical Backgroundmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Cognitive constructivism is a significant theoretical paradigm that supports the usefulness of blended learning in enhancing critical thinking abilities. According to the source, learning is a dynamic process in which knowledge is built by combining new information with pre-existing mental frameworks (Hammad et al, 2020). Blended learning environments integrate various teaching methods, including direct instruction, interactive simulations, collaborative activities, and online resources.…”
Section: Background Of Blended Learningmentioning
confidence: 99%