2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.apgeochem.2022.105273
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A review of machine learning in geochemistry and cosmochemistry: Method improvements and applications

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0
3

Year Published

2023
2023
2025
2025

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 40 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 215 publications
0
10
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…A machine learning model is data-driven, learning from data and improving accuracy without explicit programming. Over time, machine learning has evolved into various learning technologies, including connectionism, symbolism, and statistical learning [62]. In the context of groundwater, machine learning has several important tasks.…”
Section: Machine Learning History and Groundwatermentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…A machine learning model is data-driven, learning from data and improving accuracy without explicit programming. Over time, machine learning has evolved into various learning technologies, including connectionism, symbolism, and statistical learning [62]. In the context of groundwater, machine learning has several important tasks.…”
Section: Machine Learning History and Groundwatermentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One of machine learning's key learning technologies is symbolism. Logic involves manipulating symbols, rules, and operations [62]. Symbolism has been used to create groundwater expert systems, which are rule-based systems that mimic human decisionmaking [63].…”
Section: Symbolismmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition to images (e.g., geochemical maps, electron microscope images), a significant amount of important geochemical information is stored in tabular data, such as the concentrations and speciation of chemical compounds, elemental concentrations, and isotopic ratios. When applied to these data sets, machine learning (ML) can reveal deep structural patterns with the data, thereby bringing new geochemical insights (Chicchi et al., 2023; He et al., 2022; Morrison et al., 2017; Petrelli & Perugini, 2016; Prabhu et al., 2021; Qin et al., 2022; Stracke et al., 2022; Tao et al., 2021; Wen et al., 2021). Although flourishing, ML implementation is laborious and time‐consuming for most geochemists because they must, for example, locate codes from scikit‐learn (Pedregosa et al., 2011), modify codes to fit their unique data set(s), and tune the model's hyperparameters.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For identifying weak anomalies in continuous-field stream sediment geochemical data, local singularity analysis (LSA) was proposed by Cheng (2007) and demonstrated by Wang et al (2018) and Zuo et al (2009). Recently, a variety of machine learning and deep learning algorithms have been widely developed and applied to map geochemical anomalies (He et al, 2022;Wu et al, 2022;Xiong and Zuo, 2022;Zhang et al, 2022).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%