1978
DOI: 10.1177/000456327801500141
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Review of Methods for Plasma Paracetamol Estimation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

1979
1979
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 39 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The results are therefore even more difficult to interpret than those from a method which gives complete hydrolysis. Wiener (1978) mentioned the problem of nonspecificity of some methods in his review and quoted the work of White (1976), which indicated that paracetamol may be overestimated.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The results are therefore even more difficult to interpret than those from a method which gives complete hydrolysis. Wiener (1978) mentioned the problem of nonspecificity of some methods in his review and quoted the work of White (1976), which indicated that paracetamol may be overestimated.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Many methods have been described, and the subject has recently been reviewed by Wiener (1978). However, some methods which have become popular on the grounds of simplicity and speed are non-specific and give rise to serious errors since they also measure the inactive glucuronide and sulphate conjugates of paracetamol which are present in plasma in amounts which may greatly exceed the concentration of the unchanged drug (Prescott and Wright, 1973).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These methods were reviewed in 1978. 46 Only a brief resume of methods up to 1978 will be given here.…”
Section: Early Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Most of the samples were based on horse serum, and this can sometimes show different extraction characteristics from human samples (Wiener, 1978). However, laboratories using organic extraction methods displayed no obvious change in bias of results for the human samples that were distributed.…”
Section: Bmentioning
confidence: 99%