Accepted ManuscriptConstitution of a catchment virtual observatory for sharing flow and transport models outputs Zahra Thomas, Pauline Rousseau-Gueutin, Tamara Kolbe, Benjamin W. Abbott, Jean Marçais, Stefan Peiffer, Sven Frei, Kevin Bishop, Pascal Pichelin, Gilles Pinay, Jean-Raynald de Dreuzy PII:S0022-1694(16)30260-8 DOI:http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2016.04.067 Reference:HYDROL 21237To appear in:
Journal of HydrologyPlease cite this article as: Thomas, Z., Rousseau-Gueutin, P., Kolbe, T., Abbott, B.W., Marçais, J., Peiffer, S., Frei, S., Bishop, K., Pichelin, P., Pinay, G., de Dreuzy, J-R., Constitution of a catchment virtual observatory for sharing flow and transport models outputs, Journal of Hydrology (2016), doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.
2016.04.067This is a PDF file of an unedited manuscript that has been accepted for publication. As a service to our customers we are providing this early version of the manuscript. The manuscript will undergo copyediting, typesetting, and review of the resulting proof before it is published in its final form. Please note that during the production process errors may be discovered which could affect the content, and all legal disclaimers that apply to the journal pertain. The mean transit time and whole stream residence time distribution are powerful metrics of catchment functioning, providing synoptic hydrological information such as water renewal time, heterogeneity of flowpaths, and overall water volume (Godsey et al., 2010;Hrachowitz et al., 2010; Marçais et al., 2015;McGuire and McDonnell, 2006;Van der Velde et al., 2012) . These hydrological parameters influence catchment biogeochemistry (Ocampo et al., 2006;Oldham et al., 2013;Pinay et al., 2015;Tetzlaff et al., 2007), further increasing their value as
Constitution of a catchment virtual observatory for sharing flow and transport modelsObservatory for sharing models outputs Thomas et al. 4 indicators and predictors of catchment-scale water quality and chemistry. Because these parameters are of great general interest they feature prominently in the inputs and outputs of many models (e.g. McGuire et al., 2005;Tetzlaff et al., 2009a (Bishop et al., 2008). Small catchments express a wide diversity of subsurface flow configurations (Eberts et al., 2012;Gburek and Folmar, 1999;Sophocleous, 2002;Winter, 1999) depending on geological and topographical structures, distribution and timing of recharge, characteristics of the vadose zone, and free surface dynamics of the underlying aquifer (Bresciani et al., 2014;Schumann et al., 2010;Freer et al., 2002;Montgomery and Dietrich, 1989;O'loughlin, 1981;Ć imĆnek et al., 2003;Voeckler et al., 2014; Dages et al., 2009; de Vries and Simmers, 2002;Scanlon et al., 2002).Observatory for sharing models outputs Thomas et al. 6 Perhaps most importantly in regards to catchment hydrology, small catchments are a convenient and powerful experimental unit. Compared to large catchments, there are fewer processes influencing behaviour of small catchments and collecti...