2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2014.10.056
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A review of methods for modelling environmental tracers in groundwater: Advantages of tracer concentration simulation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
59
0
1

Year Published

2015
2015
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 102 publications
(60 citation statements)
references
References 195 publications
0
59
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…It is also a powerful integrative approach of groundwater origin and flow path organisation within aquifers (Anders et al, 2014;Bertrand et al, 2010;Gooddy et al, 2006;Jaunat et al, 2012;Kamtchueng et al, 2015). Furthermore, groundwater residence time provides information to constrain recharge area, discharge rate, flow directions and velocities, all necessary to either quantitatively validate a numerical or conceptual hydrogeological model Post et al, 2013;Turnadge and Smerdon, 2014;Zuber et al, 2005). When groundwater residence times are over timescale of 0-70 years, dating tools such as tritium, chlorofluorocarbons (CFCs) or sulphur hexafluoride (SF 6 ) may be used (Aeschbach-Hertig et al, 1998;Alvarado et al, 2005;Cook and Solomon, 1997;Corcho Alvarado et al, 2007;Delbart et al, 2014).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…It is also a powerful integrative approach of groundwater origin and flow path organisation within aquifers (Anders et al, 2014;Bertrand et al, 2010;Gooddy et al, 2006;Jaunat et al, 2012;Kamtchueng et al, 2015). Furthermore, groundwater residence time provides information to constrain recharge area, discharge rate, flow directions and velocities, all necessary to either quantitatively validate a numerical or conceptual hydrogeological model Post et al, 2013;Turnadge and Smerdon, 2014;Zuber et al, 2005). When groundwater residence times are over timescale of 0-70 years, dating tools such as tritium, chlorofluorocarbons (CFCs) or sulphur hexafluoride (SF 6 ) may be used (Aeschbach-Hertig et al, 1998;Alvarado et al, 2005;Cook and Solomon, 1997;Corcho Alvarado et al, 2007;Delbart et al, 2014).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However a sample taken at a given location is often a mixture of waters that have been transported via various flow paths. Thus this residence time should be mostly interpreted as a weighted mean of idealized residence times (Bethke and Johnson, 2008;Goode, 1996;Jodar et al, 2014;Suckow, 2014;Torgersen et al, 2013;Turnadge and Smerdon, 2014). The major advantage of CFCs and SF 6 resides in the possibility to discriminate different water bodies considering various mixing models (piston flow, binary or exponential), providing information on aquifer functioning (Cook et al, 1995;Jodar et al, 2014;Kashiwaya et al, 2014;Zuber et al, 2005).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Tracer-based methods have the advantage of being direct but can be relatively difficult to conduct, especially at the field scale. Moreover, the interpretation of breakthrough curves requires careful consideration of the properties of the tracer and the porous medium-for example, tracer mass transport mechanisms such as: (1) sorption to the porous medium, (2) diffusion from mobile to immobile pore water, (3) volatilization to the unsaturated zone, and (4) degradation or transformation are not truly representative of the void spaces through which water can travel by advection, i.e., effective porosity (Davis et al 1980;Turnadge and Smerdon 2014). Hall et al (1991) developed a relatively simple tracer-based method to calculate effective porosity based on conducting and interpreting the data from a single-well push-pull test.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As it is impractical to measure the whole travel time distribution using injected hydrological tracers (but see Rodhe et al, 1996), different approaches, such as lumped parameter models, particle-tracking, and direct age simulation, have been developed to estimate travel time distributions (Turnadge and Smerdon, 2014). Several distribution types have been used in catchment studies, including the dispersion model (Kirchner et al, 2001;McGlynn et al, 8 2003;McGuire et al, 2002), the piston flow model (McGlynn et al, 2003), and exponentialpiston flow (Maloszewski and Zuber, 1996;McGlynn et al, 2003;McGuire et al, 2002;Timbe et al, 2014).…”
Section: Time Distribution Terms and Conceptsmentioning
confidence: 99%