2014
DOI: 10.21314/jop.2014.135
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A review of methods for combining internal and external data

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These quantitative models combine internal and external data to overcome the limitation of modelling only internal risk event data only, which refers to the volume of data available, because extreme OpR events rarely occur. Thus, internal data is mixed with external data so that tail events can be modelled [20,21].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These quantitative models combine internal and external data to overcome the limitation of modelling only internal risk event data only, which refers to the volume of data available, because extreme OpR events rarely occur. Thus, internal data is mixed with external data so that tail events can be modelled [20,21].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Berg-Yuen and Medova [54], based on a sample of 50 internationally operating banks for the period from 2005 to 2006, analyse the relationship between economic capital and required regulatory capital set aside for operational risk. The last study in this subgroup, conducted by Galloppo and Previati [6], introduces several approaches that mix internal and external data to estimate the frequency and severity of operational losses.…”
Section: Pillar Imentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since internal databases of single banks are generally biased towards high-frequency and low-severity events, as they lack a sufficient number of tail events that would limit accurate modelling of the tail part of loss distribution, Basel II requires banks using AMA to supplement their internal data with external data to measure operational risk capital [1]. However, as noted throughout the current article, the literature highlights the shortage of systematically recorded operational loss databases for conducting empirical research or testing the validity of newly developed models on "real" 15 operational loss data (see, e.g., [5][6][7][8]87]). Taking these claims into the consideration, we identify operational risk databases used in the assessed articles and provide an overview of the content as well as on implication's frequency of identified databases that are listed in Table 3.…”
Section: Operational Loss Databasesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations