2000
DOI: 10.1243/0954409001531306
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A review of methods to measure and calculate train resistances

Abstract: This paper discusses a well-known tool for calculating train resistance to motion and its suitability for describing operations at high speed. The tool, originally developed by Armstrong and Swift [1], also permits the estimation of the contribution to aerodynamic resistance of various features of the architecture of a train. They compare this approach with the results of other formulae for calculating train resistance, as well as published measurements taken during experimental work. It is concluded that Arms… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
118
0
1

Year Published

2010
2010
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 220 publications
(127 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
0
118
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…A number of studies have developed models to calculate running resistance to assist with experimental data and computational fluid dynamics (CFD) results in the optimisation of train design (Rochard and Schmid, 2000). Running resistance can be divided into five items (Lukaszewicz, 2009).…”
Section: Freight Researchmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…A number of studies have developed models to calculate running resistance to assist with experimental data and computational fluid dynamics (CFD) results in the optimisation of train design (Rochard and Schmid, 2000). Running resistance can be divided into five items (Lukaszewicz, 2009).…”
Section: Freight Researchmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…where (Rochard and Schmid, 2000). Coefficients A and B relate to mechanical resistance and C the aerodynamic resistance (Rochard and Schmid, 2000).…”
Section: Freight Researchmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The combination of these two resistance forces is called the drag force. Different [20] is commonly used in Eq. 6.…”
Section: Gradient Forcementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The Davis equation (Rochard 2001) in Equation<3-1> is different from Hill (1994a) because it does not include a variable for wheel-rail contact.…”
Section: Simulation Of Energy Efficiency Improvements On Commuter Raimentioning
confidence: 99%