2018
DOI: 10.1177/0890117117744849
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Review of Military Health Research Using a Social–Ecological Framework

Abstract: We know relatively little about how family and community respond to the return of personnel from combat deployment; how family resources affect the health of returning military personnel; and how a war's persistence presents challenges for federal, state, and local agencies to meet military health-care needs. Such work is especially salient as US troops return home from war-particularly in communities where there are substantial military populations.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
11
0
2

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 112 publications
(164 reference statements)
1
11
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Program evaluation efforts for SOCAT, Chaplains‐CARE, and the Suicide Death Review are underway (United States Department of Health and Human Services (U.S. DHHS) Office of the Surgeon General and the National Action Alliance for Suicide Prevention, 2012; DoD, 2015). Examination of programs through the social‐ecological framework can identify important gaps in programming and research (Lubens & Bruckner, 2018). Future efforts focused on stigma reduction (e.g., Monteith et al, 2019) and cultural change (e.g., Executive Order No.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Program evaluation efforts for SOCAT, Chaplains‐CARE, and the Suicide Death Review are underway (United States Department of Health and Human Services (U.S. DHHS) Office of the Surgeon General and the National Action Alliance for Suicide Prevention, 2012; DoD, 2015). Examination of programs through the social‐ecological framework can identify important gaps in programming and research (Lubens & Bruckner, 2018). Future efforts focused on stigma reduction (e.g., Monteith et al, 2019) and cultural change (e.g., Executive Order No.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Social ecologically based suicide prevention programming takes into consideration empirically supported suicide risk and protective factors at each level, incorporates multi‐level suicide prevention strategies, and includes program evaluation (Cramer & Kapusta, 2017). This framework can be used to inform, organize, and evaluate military suicide prevention efforts within the DoD and identify important gaps in military health research and program development (Lubens & Bruckner, 2018).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Por fim, a questão 7.2 (satisfação com o local de trabalho) apresentou um padrão de carga cruzada para os fatores 3 e 4 (estresse/sono e condição de trabalho). Outros estudos demonstram que a satisfação com o local trabalho está diretamente associada com o nível de estresse 20 .…”
Section: Discussionunclassified
“…Segundo a Sociedade Canadense para a Fisiologia do Exercício, os correlatos e determinantes da saúde podem ser agrupados em cinco categorias 19 : 1) capacidades individuais e habilidades de enfrentamento; que estão relacionadas às características fisiológicas e psicológicas dos indivíduos como a genética, volição, e perspectiva pessoal de vida; 2) práticas pessoais de saúde; que estão relacionadas aos comportamentos que melhoram a saúde ou a colocam em risco; 3) ambiente socioeconômico; que envolve renda, trabalho, status social, rede de apoio social, educação e fatores sociais no local de trabalho; 4) ambiente físico; que se refere a fatores do ambiente natural e construído; e 5) serviços de saúde; que se refere ao acesso a serviços que promovem, mantém ou restauram a saúde. Percebe-se que as últimas três categorias guardam proximidade com as características sociodemográficas associadas a família, comunidade e instituição de trabalho, as quais têm se mostrado fortes preditores de saúde e bem-estar em militares 20 .…”
Section: Introductionunclassified
“…His bioecological model (2005) identifies five interrelated systems that can influence the growth and development of an individual: the microsystem (immediate environments), mesosystem (connections between environments), exosystem (indirect environments), macrosystem (social and cultural aspects) and chronosystem (time-related aspects). In his previous modelthe social-ecological framework - Bronfenbrenner (1979) viewed the individual as an entity that interacts in and with his/her immediate environment and who is impacted by four types of dimensions: individual, interpersonal, professional and societal (Blais et al, 2009;Bronfenbrenner, 1979;Elnitsky et al, 2017a, b;Lubens and Bruckner, 2018;Reistetter and Abreu, 2005;Resnik et al, 2009).…”
Section: Reintegrationmentioning
confidence: 99%