2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.earscirev.2019.04.013
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A review of modeling the effects of vegetation on large wood recruitment processes in mountain catchments

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
40
0
2

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

3
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 41 publications
(42 citation statements)
references
References 201 publications
0
40
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Models fed with remotely sensed data, such as aerial imagery and forest cover information, enable the simulation and identification of recruitment processes and sources and the estimation of wood supplied volumes (Gregory and Meleason, 2003;Mazzorana et al, 2009;Ruiz-Villanueva et al, 2014a;Cislaghi et al, 2018). High-resolution canopy models obtained from LiDAR or photogrammetry may provide more accurate estimation of wood volumes (Steeb et al, 2017;Gasser et al, 2019). Scenarios based on forecasted climate change alterations of vegetation cover, flow regimes and human activities can be also designed to explore and quantify the range of variability of instream wood supply, and to make predictions about how differences in river and forest management may alter instream wood supply (e.g.…”
Section: Catchment-scale Modelsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Models fed with remotely sensed data, such as aerial imagery and forest cover information, enable the simulation and identification of recruitment processes and sources and the estimation of wood supplied volumes (Gregory and Meleason, 2003;Mazzorana et al, 2009;Ruiz-Villanueva et al, 2014a;Cislaghi et al, 2018). High-resolution canopy models obtained from LiDAR or photogrammetry may provide more accurate estimation of wood volumes (Steeb et al, 2017;Gasser et al, 2019). Scenarios based on forecasted climate change alterations of vegetation cover, flow regimes and human activities can be also designed to explore and quantify the range of variability of instream wood supply, and to make predictions about how differences in river and forest management may alter instream wood supply (e.g.…”
Section: Catchment-scale Modelsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The motion of wood logs in rivers involves three steps: recruitment, transport, and deposition (Gasser et al, 2019). Recruitment is a combination of selection and delivery mechanisms of wood logs from river bedforms and banks into streams and is triggered by stochastic geophysical events such as hillslope failure (Cadol et al, 2009;Comiti et al, 2016;Iroumé et al, 2015;Keller & Swanson, 1979;Nakamura & Swanson, 1993;Rigon et al, 2012), bank erosion (Downs & Simon, 2001;A.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The distance of the tree stem to the streambank/water interface was placed at 1.00 m. Relative cumulative erosion reduction of 100% was reached by four different cross sections: At the four cross sections, total modeled absolute erosion reduction was at most 1.04 m and the median sediment diameter was exclusively ≥ 112 mm. Based on the modeled results of the 37 study reaches in this study, we propose a modified version of the susceptibility matrix presented in Gasser et al [84] (Figure 12). While the matrix presented in Gasser et al [84] was based on values found in the literature, the matrix presented in this article was adapted based on the original matrix considering the modeled results.…”
Section: Susceptibility To Hydraulic Bank Erosion Considering the Effmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The matrix is however only valid for streambanks where rooting depth is greater or equal to streambank height. Green areas represent channel conditions (channel width and slope) Based on the modeled results of the 37 study reaches in this study, we propose a modified version of the susceptibility matrix presented in Gasser et al [84] (Figure 12). While the matrix presented in Gasser et al [84] was based on values found in the literature, the matrix presented in this article was adapted based on the original matrix considering the modeled results.…”
Section: Susceptibility To Hydraulic Bank Erosion Considering the Effmentioning
confidence: 99%