2007
DOI: 10.1016/j.envsoft.2005.12.005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A review of models for low impact urban stormwater drainage

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
302
0
14

Year Published

2013
2013
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 541 publications
(316 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
0
302
0
14
Order By: Relevance
“…Models that include information of the cycle of the wastewater as rainfall-runoff, hydraulic transport, pollutant transport process, overflow-runoff, and WWTP [84,85]. 2.…”
Section: Modeling Approachesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Models that include information of the cycle of the wastewater as rainfall-runoff, hydraulic transport, pollutant transport process, overflow-runoff, and WWTP [84,85]. 2.…”
Section: Modeling Approachesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One of the key limiting factors in the widespread adoption of such systems is the lack of adequate analytical and modeling tools (Elliot and Trowsdale, 2007). The availability of an effective LID modeling software could encourage a wider adoption of LID principles.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A great number of integrated models have been developed, tested and applied in the last decade with main focus on combined sewer systems, whereas diffuse pollution loads deriving from separate systems and stormwater treatment have received little attention from modelers, with some relevant exceptions (see for example the review in Elliott and Trowsdale, 2007). Also, as discussed by Bertrand-Krajewski (2007), stormwater quality modeling is affected by significant sources of uncertainty, which may limit the application of these tools in practice.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%