2011
DOI: 10.1111/j.1463-1326.2011.01395.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A review of modern insulin analogue pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic profiles in type 2 diabetes: improvements and limitations

Abstract: Insulin analogues have been engineered to enhance desired molecular properties without altering immunogenicity. The majority of insulin pharmacology studies are conducted in healthy volunteers and patients with type 1 diabetes. At present, there are more patients with type 2 than type 1 diabetes receiving insulin treatment. As the responsibility for initiating insulin therapy in these patients continues to shift to primary care, it will be important for general practitioners to understand the different pharmac… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

6
87
0
4

Year Published

2013
2013
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 132 publications
(97 citation statements)
references
References 55 publications
6
87
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…The latter result could be explained on the one hand by a slightly higher frequency of type 1 diabetics in group 2 and on the other hand the indication of insulin analogues could have been Insulin analogues offer the opportunity to mimic the physiological secretion of insulin thus allowing more flexibility and freedom to patients and a lower risk of hypoglycaemia [19]. Insulin detemir disappears more slowly from the subcutaneous tissue than NPH and has a more "flat" pharmacodynamics than of NPH (no peak action at usual doses).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The latter result could be explained on the one hand by a slightly higher frequency of type 1 diabetics in group 2 and on the other hand the indication of insulin analogues could have been Insulin analogues offer the opportunity to mimic the physiological secretion of insulin thus allowing more flexibility and freedom to patients and a lower risk of hypoglycaemia [19]. Insulin detemir disappears more slowly from the subcutaneous tissue than NPH and has a more "flat" pharmacodynamics than of NPH (no peak action at usual doses).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The hypoglycemia risk of protamine-based premixes derives partly from pharmacological variability, resulting in hyper-and hypoinsulinemia [28]. There is, therefore, a strong clinical need for the development of a combination insulin that can provide sustained and stable basal insulin coverage together with optimal prandial insulin kinetics in a single injection, without either compromising the other.…”
Section: Use Of Prandial/basal Insulin Combination In T2dmmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The pharmacokinetic profile of the protamine-based basal component of existing biphasic insulins does not give a physiologically flat profile. In addition, existing biphasic insulins may not provide the duration of action for a physiological basal insulin replacement [27,28] and are more complex to titrate than basal insulin analogs used alone. Additional disadvantages include the fixed ratio of meal to basal insulin dose, and the inability of some basal insulin analogs (insulin detemir [IDet] and insulin glargine [IGlar]) to be co-formulated with mealtime insulin due to alterations of their pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic profiles, making them unsuitable for optimum glycemic control [29][30][31].…”
Section: Use Of Prandial/basal Insulin Combination In T2dmmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Biphasic insulin analogues have a mixture of rapid or short acting insulin analogue with intermediateacting insulin. 29 Table 1 shows Pharmacokinetic profiles of Insulin therapies.…”
Section: Modern Insulinsmentioning
confidence: 99%