2019
DOI: 10.5070/d3257044797
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A review of next generation sequencing technologies used in the evaluation of the skin microbiome: what a time to be alive

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
15
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
0
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Microbiome sequence processing was carried out in three steps: preprocessing, clustering similar sequences to obtain Operational Taxonomic Units (OTUs), and annotating the OTU sequences ( Sandhu, Pourang & Sivamani, 2019 ). The raw FASTQ files were filtered and trimmed at Q score 30 to remove low-quality reads and PCR-generated chimeric sequences.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Microbiome sequence processing was carried out in three steps: preprocessing, clustering similar sequences to obtain Operational Taxonomic Units (OTUs), and annotating the OTU sequences ( Sandhu, Pourang & Sivamani, 2019 ). The raw FASTQ files were filtered and trimmed at Q score 30 to remove low-quality reads and PCR-generated chimeric sequences.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Bacterial rRNA depletion in complex samples can be challenging [ 72 ], and insufficient depletion leads to a high proportion of rRNA reads, which does not provide information on the functional activity of the microbiome. Other challenges include the adequate recovery of RNA from low-biomass skin samples and the potential for a high level of host RNA that effectively diminishes the recovery of microbial mRNA signals, requiring higher sequencing depths to overcome these obstacles [ 73 ]. Different sources of functional information can be used to assign annotation to reads, including, for example, Pfam [ 74 ], the Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes (KEGG) [ 75 ], Clusters of Orthologous Genes (COG) [ 76 ], and Swiss-Prot [ 77 ].…”
Section: Ongoing and Proposed Approaches To Study The Skin Microbiomementioning
confidence: 99%
“…In contrast to above‐mentioned DNA‐based analyses, metatranscriptomics directly profiles actively transcribed genes within the community, which are a proxy for its active metabolism at the moment of sampling. The current limitations of this method are the low coverage of existing reference databases, increased effort in sample preparation, high risk of contamination and mRNA degradation, and high cost (Sandhu et al ., 2019 ). Despite these issues, metatranscriptomics has a high potential for elucidating the response of the skin microbiome to various conditions related to skin diseases.…”
Section: Current Analytical Approachesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This approach is highly adept at detecting small compounds produced by the microbiota and is often combined with amplicon or shotgun metagenomic sequencing. Similarly to metaproteomics, the high cost, laborious sample preparation and sparse reference databases have however limited its applications in microbiomes (Sandhu et al ., 2019 ). In skin microbial communities, metabolomics has been used to characterize biomarkers of healing wounds and their connections with specific bacteria in the associated microbial community (Ashrafi et al ., 2020 ).…”
Section: Current Analytical Approachesmentioning
confidence: 99%