1996
DOI: 10.1080/07408179608966250
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A review of numerically controlled methods for finish-sculptured-surface machining

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2001
2001
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Machining of mechanical parts requires generation of tool paths defining motion of the tool with respect to the part [6]. Three-axis tool paths are represented G05.…”
Section: Format Of 5-axis Curve Interpolationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Machining of mechanical parts requires generation of tool paths defining motion of the tool with respect to the part [6]. Three-axis tool paths are represented G05.…”
Section: Format Of 5-axis Curve Interpolationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There are also some other tool path generation methods such as j^ece curve mcfAwf (Austin et al, 1997;Shah et al, 1991), Ao-cwrvafwre (Jensen and Anderson, 1992), etc.. Extensive reviews on tool path planning maybe found in Marshall and Griffiths (1994), Dragomatz and Mann (1997), Jenson and Anderson (1996), S arma (2000).…”
Section: Prq/ecfkm Cwrvementioning
confidence: 99%
“…1,2 In order to estimate the adjustment, it needs to compute the envelope at current cutter positioning. However, the envelope of the cutter is unreachable in mathematics until all the positionings in a path are determined.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%