2012
DOI: 10.1353/pla.2012.0000
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Review of Open Access Self-Archiving Mandate Policies

Abstract: This article reviews the history of open access (OA) policies and examines the current status of mandate policy implementations. It finds that hundreds of policies have been proposed and adopted at various organizational levels and many of them have shown a positive effect on the rate of repository content accumulation. However, it also detects policies showing little or no visible impact on repository development, and attempts to analyze the effects of different types of policies, with varied levels of succes… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
59
0
10

Year Published

2013
2013
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 73 publications
(69 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
0
59
0
10
Order By: Relevance
“…The authors collected variables such as total number of deposits and deposit rate for each of 155 institutions that adopted an OA policy and reveal that policy strength has a positive correlation with the number of deposits and the rate of deposits (the number of articles deposited/total number of articles published). Conversely, Xia et al (2012) suggest that passing a policy does not, on its own, change faculty attitudes regarding OA or deposit practices. Furthermore, the authors emphasize that an OA policy needs to reward faculty who deposit their articles in an OA repository as part of the tenure process.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…The authors collected variables such as total number of deposits and deposit rate for each of 155 institutions that adopted an OA policy and reveal that policy strength has a positive correlation with the number of deposits and the rate of deposits (the number of articles deposited/total number of articles published). Conversely, Xia et al (2012) suggest that passing a policy does not, on its own, change faculty attitudes regarding OA or deposit practices. Furthermore, the authors emphasize that an OA policy needs to reward faculty who deposit their articles in an OA repository as part of the tenure process.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Jubb et al, have recently produced a report highlighting the rapid rise of green and gold OA uptake in the UK-rises which can be reasonably attributed, at least in part, to strong OA policy mandates [8]. However, others argue that these mandates alone cannot transform the scholarly publishing environment [33,34], emphasising that major barriers remain in author behaviours and academic cultures.…”
Section: Rise Of Open Access and Mandatesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Other studies examine OA policies in relation to their impact on the amount of content deposited in repositories 6 or published in OA journals 7 . There are also studies that seek to inform good practice in policymaking 8 , to provide guidelines on how to develop OA policies 9 or to examine the effectiveness of OA policies whilst making recommendations on criteria that OA policies must include and on which they should align…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%