2016
DOI: 10.1002/cnm.2833
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A review of personalized blood glucose prediction strategies for T1DM patients

Abstract: This paper presents a methodological review of models for predicting blood glucose (BG) concentration, risks and BG events. The surveyed models are classified into three categories, and they are presented in summary tables containing the most relevant data regarding the experimental setup for fitting and testing each model as well as the input signals and the performance metrics. Each category exhibits trends that are presented and discussed. This document aims to be a compact guide to determine the modeling o… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
175
0
1

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 231 publications
(177 citation statements)
references
References 117 publications
1
175
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In recent years many algorithms have been proposed for glucose forecasting [8], such as polynomial models (autoregressive (AR), autoregressive exogenous (ARX), autoregressive moving-average (ARMA)) [9], machine learning models The work was supported by EPSRC EP/P00993X/1. [10] and latent-variable-based statistical models [11].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In recent years many algorithms have been proposed for glucose forecasting [8], such as polynomial models (autoregressive (AR), autoregressive exogenous (ARX), autoregressive moving-average (ARMA)) [9], machine learning models The work was supported by EPSRC EP/P00993X/1. [10] and latent-variable-based statistical models [11].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A significant amount of research has been done for forecasting blood glucose levels within a short to mid-term horizon (15min-2hours) [18], and some of this work has been translated to commercial products, such as the predictive lowglucose insulin suspension systems (Medtronic 640G and Tandem Basal-IQ). However, such short prediction horizons might not always be sufficient to prevent overnight hypoglycaemia and do not prevent the user from waking up during the night in the case of a prediction alert being triggered.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the inclusion off such models tends to add unwarranted complexity as the pathophysiological and etiological relevance of these states are not well-understood, while producing negligible variations in the observable input-output behaviors that are presently more relevant to healthcare outcomes. Thus, in the development and analysis of systems for the closed-loop treatment of diabetes, models are generally categorized according to their level of detail and may be considered as either (i) reduced complexity control-oriented models -for controller synthesis methods [53], or (ii) high-fidelity models for analysis and validation [55], [56]. In either case, these models attempt to replicate the glucoregulatory dynamics of diabetic patients.…”
Section: Modeling For Analysis and Control Of Diabetesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Despite its complexity, the Cambridge model is frequently used in internal model or model predictive control schemes [53], [74] and has been the basis for several clinically tested investigatory closed-loop devices [75].…”
Section: ) Minimal Glucoregulatory Modelsmentioning
confidence: 99%