2023
DOI: 10.1016/j.envpol.2023.121138
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A review of PFAS adsorption from aqueous solutions: Current approaches, engineering applications, challenges, and opportunities

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
43
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 93 publications
(43 citation statements)
references
References 154 publications
0
43
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Given the unique physicochemical properties of PFAS, including the hydrophobic and oleophobic characteristics of the perfluoroalkyl tail and the charged functional headgroup, PFAS are susceptible to various chemical interactions. These include but are not limited to electrostatic, ion exchange, ligand exchange, and hydrophobic interactions, as well as physical interactions, including surface adsorption and occlusion within adsorbent pores. Specifically, key sorption mechanisms for ion-exchange resins include ion exchange, electrostatic interactions between the charged functional groups of PFAS and the resin matrix, hydrophobic interactions between the fluoroalkyl PFAS tail and the polymer chain of the resin, and the formation of aggregates on active sites of the resin surface, and carbonaceous adsorbents (such as granular activated carbon) can adsorb PFAS via hydrophobic partitioning of PFAS onto the carbon matrix and via sequestration in micropores, with the larger surface areas of powdered activated carbon, facilitating faster and increased sorption. , Clay and variably modified clay adsorbents, such as amine-modified adsorbents, including clay–carbon composite materials, also facilitate PFAS sorption via mixed mode hydrophobic and electrostatic interactions. ,, As a result, these adsorbent-based treatments are widely applied or the treatment of PFAS-contaminated soil and water, especially focusing on ex situ applications. ,,− …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Given the unique physicochemical properties of PFAS, including the hydrophobic and oleophobic characteristics of the perfluoroalkyl tail and the charged functional headgroup, PFAS are susceptible to various chemical interactions. These include but are not limited to electrostatic, ion exchange, ligand exchange, and hydrophobic interactions, as well as physical interactions, including surface adsorption and occlusion within adsorbent pores. Specifically, key sorption mechanisms for ion-exchange resins include ion exchange, electrostatic interactions between the charged functional groups of PFAS and the resin matrix, hydrophobic interactions between the fluoroalkyl PFAS tail and the polymer chain of the resin, and the formation of aggregates on active sites of the resin surface, and carbonaceous adsorbents (such as granular activated carbon) can adsorb PFAS via hydrophobic partitioning of PFAS onto the carbon matrix and via sequestration in micropores, with the larger surface areas of powdered activated carbon, facilitating faster and increased sorption. , Clay and variably modified clay adsorbents, such as amine-modified adsorbents, including clay–carbon composite materials, also facilitate PFAS sorption via mixed mode hydrophobic and electrostatic interactions. ,, As a result, these adsorbent-based treatments are widely applied or the treatment of PFAS-contaminated soil and water, especially focusing on ex situ applications. ,,− …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This makes the use of electrostatic interaction for PFAS sorption a promising strategy . Mechanisms behind the scenes include well-established electrostatic attraction and ion exchange, whereas the existence of Coulombic repulsion is found to hinder sorption. ,, …”
Section: Interaction Mechanisms With Pfasmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…CNT, both single-walled (SWCNT) and multi-walled (MWCNT), continue to be proposed as adsorbent platforms for PFAS, but SWCNT show better adsorption performances due to the lower SSA of MWCNT [80]. Also, the modification of CNT with nano-MgAl2O4 has been proposed as an improved adsorbent for PFAS (100 ppb) allowing 99% removal after 3 hours and 100% in 3.5 hours [81].…”
Section: Advances In Concentration Strategies Of Pfasmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Metal-organic frameworks (MOF), which are innovative nanopores ordered materials with high SSA and pore volumes, have shown an increased application for PFAS adsorption in the last years [80,82,83].…”
Section: Advances In Concentration Strategies Of Pfasmentioning
confidence: 99%