A review of point‐of‐choice nutrition labelling schemes in the workplace, public eating places and universities

Abstract

Background: Nutrition labelling schemes at the point‐of‐choice allow opportunity for behaviour change by modifying the environment. In the workplace they provide a particularly good opportunity to expose employees repeatedly to healthier food choices. The Heartbeat Award scheme (HBA) is an example of such a scheme and was launched in England in 1990 by the Health Education Authority. Method: Twenty point‐of‐choice labelling schemes are reviewed in the workplace, public eating places and universities. We outline the characteristics of effective programmes, and suggest how the HBA scheme could be developed to maximize its impact. Results: Nutrition labelling schemes may be most effective when they are adapted for the target audience and use simple messages, especially if the messages promote both healthiness and taste. Even though schemes may not have an immediate effect on food choice, they may act together with other factors to enhance customer self‐efficacy, thereby increasing the likelihood of positive food choices being made. Conclusion: Most of the studies reviewed demonstrate some positive short‐term benefits from schemes. We are unable to conclude that these result in long‐term behaviour changes, because of a lack of follow‐up studies.

Fostering Sustainable Nutrition Behavior through Gamification

“…Secondly, nutrition information alone is not enough to change food choices and dietary intake. Studies have shown that an even more important moderator than knowledge is personal motivation when changing eating habits, together with interventions that target self-efficacy [95][96][97]. Leading on to the third argument, gamification is not a game as such, but a design process involving motivation.…”

Explaining the effects of a point-of-purchase nutrition-information intervention in university canteens: a structural equation modelling analysis

“…Modifications to the environment such as posting nutrition information in university canteens might not cause an immediate dietary change [10]. Consumer behaviour and information processing models posit that communication and information efforts, if being attended to and properly processed, move individuals through a sequence of hierarchical stages, often referred to as a “hierarchy of effects” [11,12].…”

Modeling Expert Opinions on Food Healthfulness: A Nutrition Metric

“…For instance, direct comparability of nutrient information across options has been shown to induce more advantageous product selections 13,17 , and there is evidence suggesting that nutrition labeling schemes may be more effective when they are better adapted to a target audience or when they employ simple messages that promote taste as well as healthiness 18 . Given specific behavioral recommendations, subsequent decision-making is evaluated more favorably according to both consumers' own judgments and expert standards 19 .…”