2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.bandc.2015.11.003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A review of predictive coding algorithms

Abstract: Predictive coding is a leading theory of how the brain performs probabilistic inference. However, there are a number of distinct algorithms which are described by the term "predictive coding". This article provides a concise review of these different predictive coding algorithms, highlighting their similarities and differences. Five algorithms are covered: linear predictive coding which has a long and influential history in the signal processing literature; the first neuroscience-related application of predict… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

7
286
0
2

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 351 publications
(295 citation statements)
references
References 51 publications
7
286
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…This notion can be traced back to seminal work by Helmholtz (1878). In the framework of predictive coding, these ideas are formalised as the interplay of (bottom-up) sensory inputs and (top-down) inferences, described in computational models with plausible neural substrates (Bastos et al, 2012;Spratling, 2017). In particular, these models describe how top-down predictions or inferences are matched to incoming sensory inputs across different levels of the cortical hierarchy.…”
Section: A Neurally Inspired Perspective On the Interpretation Of Cismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This notion can be traced back to seminal work by Helmholtz (1878). In the framework of predictive coding, these ideas are formalised as the interplay of (bottom-up) sensory inputs and (top-down) inferences, described in computational models with plausible neural substrates (Bastos et al, 2012;Spratling, 2017). In particular, these models describe how top-down predictions or inferences are matched to incoming sensory inputs across different levels of the cortical hierarchy.…”
Section: A Neurally Inspired Perspective On the Interpretation Of Cismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Whilst the various algorithms implementing these ideas may differ in their computational strategy (Spratling, 2016), they share a common set of tenets: that the brain intrinsically generates a model of the world in which it finds itself (both the external and internal milieu) which is refined – but not driven – by sensory data. That model is a ‘prediction’ in the sense that it is a guess; a best guess or a Bayesian optimal estimate based simultaneously on both sensory data and prior experience.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the precise computational procedures employed by these algorithms as well as their connections to neuronal populations are controversial and vary widely across different studies (Spratling, 2016; Bastos et al, 2012; Bogacz, 2015; Rao & Ballard, 1999; Mumford, 1992; Spratling, 2008). …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, inhibitory feedback connection implemented in the model proposed by Rao & Ballard (1999), is modified in Spratling (2008, 2016) to reflect excitatory feedback signals observed in physiology. In order to avoid negative responses, Spratling (Spratling, 2008, 2016) also replaced additive excitation and subtractive inhibition in Rao & Ballard (1999) by multiplicative and divisive modulations, respectively. In our model, we follow the approach in Rao & Ballard (1999) and implement additive excitation and subtractive inhibition for simplicity.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation