Proceedings of the Sixth International Symposium on Signal Processing and Its Applications (Cat.No.01EX467)
DOI: 10.1109/isspa.2001.949797
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A review of recent evaluation methods for image segmentation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 65 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We evaluate the segmentation methods by comparing the segmented MR images (S) to the corresponding gold standard manual segmentation (G) using spatial overlap-and distance-based metrics [69,70,71]. Those metrics are calculated using a slice-wise comparison and then averaged per patient;…”
Section: Evaluation Metricsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We evaluate the segmentation methods by comparing the segmented MR images (S) to the corresponding gold standard manual segmentation (G) using spatial overlap-and distance-based metrics [69,70,71]. Those metrics are calculated using a slice-wise comparison and then averaged per patient;…”
Section: Evaluation Metricsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In order to objectively reflect the performance of the method, we evaluated the proposed model using various evaluation metrics. The evaluation metrics for segmentation results are Dice Similarity Coefficient (DSC), Intersection over Union (IoU) and Pixel Accuracy (PA) [ 40 ]. From the perspective of calculating the region similarity, DSC and IoU were used to evaluate the distance difference between the segmentation result and the ground truth.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…First, the accuracy indicates the percentage of correctly predicted pixels for each class, while global accuracy indicates the percentage of correctly predicted pixels regardless of class. In addition, mean accuracy is the average accuracy obtained for all classes of all images used 37 . On the other hand, the intersection over union (IoU) value (TP/[TP + FP + FN]), also known as the Jaccard similarity coefficient is obtained by dividing the correctly classified pixels by the total number of predicted pixels and ground truth.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The confusion matrices for MobileNetV2-based DeepLab v3+ without augmentation and ResNet-18-based DeepLab v3+ with augmentation models accuracy obtained for all classes of all images used. 37 On the other hand, the intersection over union (IoU) value (TP/[TP + FP + FN]), also known as the Jaccard similarity coefficient is obtained by dividing the correctly classified pixels by the total number of predicted pixels and ground truth. Also, while the mean IoU is the average IoU score of all classes in the images, the average IoU of each class is weighted by the number of pixels in that class for the weighted IoU.…”
Section: Performance Metricsmentioning
confidence: 99%