2004
DOI: 10.17348/era.2.0.9-17
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Review of Recent Molecular Genetics Evidence for Sugarcane Evolution and Domestication

Abstract: In 1987, J. Daniels and B. T. Roach published an exhaustive multidisciplinary review of evidence permitting the domestication and the early evolution of sugarcane to be traced. We try here to synthesize the new data that have been produced since, and their contribution to the understanding of the global picture. It is now highly probable that sugarcane evolved from a specific lineage restricted to current genus Saccharum and independent from lineages that conducted to genera Miscanthus and Erianthus. The scena… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
79
0
8

Year Published

2004
2004
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 98 publications
(89 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
2
79
0
8
Order By: Relevance
“…In addition, in recent times, it has gained attraction due to its potential for green fuel (ethanol) production, and now much of the sugarcane in countries like Brazil and United States is being used for ethanol production (Sanghera et al 2015). Grivet et al (2004) classified the sugarcane genetic resources into three groups: (1) traditional cultivars, (2) wild relatives, and (3) modern cultivars. Traditional cultivars are the ones that descend from primary domesticates and comprise of Saccharum officinarum, S. barberi, S. sinense and S. edule.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, in recent times, it has gained attraction due to its potential for green fuel (ethanol) production, and now much of the sugarcane in countries like Brazil and United States is being used for ethanol production (Sanghera et al 2015). Grivet et al (2004) classified the sugarcane genetic resources into three groups: (1) traditional cultivars, (2) wild relatives, and (3) modern cultivars. Traditional cultivars are the ones that descend from primary domesticates and comprise of Saccharum officinarum, S. barberi, S. sinense and S. edule.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Two of them (S. spontaneum and S. robustum) are wild and always recognized; the remaining four (S. barberi, S. edule, S. officinarum, and S. sinense) are cultivated forms and have been accorded the status of species, but because they do not survive in the wild, there is an increasing trend to consider these as cultigens (Irvine 1999;Grivet et al 2004Grivet et al , 2006. The identification and delineation of those species grouped as sugarcane have been complicated by hybridizations, both natural and manmade, among themselves and with related species.…”
Section: Taxonomymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The elegant work on sugarcane reported by Grivet et al (2004) shows that GISH can be used successfully on species with large numbers of small chromosomes. It may thus be possible to use GISH to investigate the origins of such Pacific cultigens as yam (Dioscorea alata, 2n = 3x -8x = 30 -80) and kava (Piper methysticum, 2n = 10x = 130), as well as to resolve the much-debated question of the ancestry of the sweet potato (2n = 6x = 90).…”
Section: Molecular Cytogeneticsmentioning
confidence: 99%