2013
DOI: 10.1080/03057267.2013.847261
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A review of research on metacognition in science education: current and future directions

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

7
228
0
42

Year Published

2015
2015
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 307 publications
(277 citation statements)
references
References 95 publications
7
228
0
42
Order By: Relevance
“…Hartman 2001a;Jiang, Ma and Gao 2016;Sherin, Jacobs, and Philipp 2011;Zohar and Barzilai 2013). The consensus in this modest body of work, however, is that individuals' awareness of their thoughts and actions as teachers-i.e.…”
Section: Conceptualizing Teacher Metacognitionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Hartman 2001a;Jiang, Ma and Gao 2016;Sherin, Jacobs, and Philipp 2011;Zohar and Barzilai 2013). The consensus in this modest body of work, however, is that individuals' awareness of their thoughts and actions as teachers-i.e.…”
Section: Conceptualizing Teacher Metacognitionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Concerning the links between critical thinking and metacognition, we note that they are not necessarily acknowledged explicitly. For instance in a recent review about metacognition (Zohar and Barzilai, 2013), the expressions "critical thinking", "critical faculty" or any equivalent ones are absent from the paper. In contrast, "critical thinking" is one of the "learning activities" explicitly referred to metacognition by Vermunt (1996).…”
Section: Rationalementioning
confidence: 99%
“…According to a recent review on metacognition in science education (Zohar and Barzilai 2013), the development of learners' conceptual understanding has long been a central focus of science education research. However, previous reviews of metacognition in science education have claimed the role of metacognition in developing learners' understanding of specific science concepts has not been sufficiently studied in such contexts.…”
Section: Forewordmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Finally, the review of studies of metacognition in science education (Zohar and Barzilai 2013) revealed that there are an insufficient number of studies of teachers' (both preservice and in-service) knowledge and professional development regarding metacognition. This research gap is a serious limitation in the ability to carry out large-scale implementation of metacognitive instruction in authentic classrooms.…”
Section: Forewordmentioning
confidence: 99%