Abstract:Larger studies with better patient selection are needed to investigate the effect of SNS on incontinence following radiotherapy or rectal surgery.
“…[67][68][69] Success was noted in 47-100% of patients subjected to a test implantation and QOL was generally improved. 67 The difficulty in interpreting this data is that the patient groups are heterogeneous. Some, but not all, of the patients had radiation for rectal cancer, and the rectal resections were done for different disease processes such as cancer or Crohn's disease.…”
Section: Fecal Incontinence (Fi)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As these patients have altered anatomy after resection of the rectum, it is unclear how much benefit SNM may play in achieving relief of symptoms. Two separate studies were conducted on the utility of SNS in LARS . Success was noted in 47‐100% of patients subjected to a test implantation and QOL was generally improved .…”
Section: Fecal Incontinence (Fi)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Two separate studies were conducted on the utility of SNS in LARS . Success was noted in 47‐100% of patients subjected to a test implantation and QOL was generally improved . The difficulty in interpreting this data is that the patient groups are heterogeneous.…”
These guidelines undoubtedly constitute a reference document, which will help urologists, gynecologists, and colorectal surgeons optimize their use of SNM for refractory urinary urgency and frequency, UUI, NOR, and FI.
“…[67][68][69] Success was noted in 47-100% of patients subjected to a test implantation and QOL was generally improved. 67 The difficulty in interpreting this data is that the patient groups are heterogeneous. Some, but not all, of the patients had radiation for rectal cancer, and the rectal resections were done for different disease processes such as cancer or Crohn's disease.…”
Section: Fecal Incontinence (Fi)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As these patients have altered anatomy after resection of the rectum, it is unclear how much benefit SNM may play in achieving relief of symptoms. Two separate studies were conducted on the utility of SNS in LARS . Success was noted in 47‐100% of patients subjected to a test implantation and QOL was generally improved .…”
Section: Fecal Incontinence (Fi)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Two separate studies were conducted on the utility of SNS in LARS . Success was noted in 47‐100% of patients subjected to a test implantation and QOL was generally improved . The difficulty in interpreting this data is that the patient groups are heterogeneous.…”
These guidelines undoubtedly constitute a reference document, which will help urologists, gynecologists, and colorectal surgeons optimize their use of SNM for refractory urinary urgency and frequency, UUI, NOR, and FI.
“…The respondents agreed (85-98.5 %) that SNS might be useful in the case of fecal incontinence following anterior rectal resection, after low anterior rectal resection and chemoradiotherapy, following anorectal surgery, and status post pelvic irradiation. The board of experts unanimously shares this view ( [7,8]; . Fig.…”
“…Another review of SNS for fecal incontinence following rectal cancer and radiotherapy highlighted the heterogeneity in operations performed, doses of radiotherapy received and the wide variation in patient symptoms as barriers to draw meaningful conclusions, however, they did note that implantation of SNS improved symptoms and quality of life in patients [17].…”
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.