A review of simulation training and new 3D computer-generated synthetic organs for robotic surgery education

Abstract

We conducted a comprehensive review of surgical simulation models used in robotic surgery education. We present an assessment of the validity and cost-effectiveness of virtual and augmented reality simulation, animal, cadaver and synthetic organ models. Face, content, construct, concurrent and predictive validity criteria were applied to each simulation model. There are six major commercial simulation machines available for robot-assisted surgery. The validity of virtual reality (VR) simulation curricula for psychomotor assessment and skill acquisition for the early phase of robotic surgery training has been demonstrated. The widespread adoption of VR simulation has been limited by the high cost of these machines. Live animal and cadavers have been the accepted standard for robotic surgical simulation since it began in the early 2000s. Our review found that there is a lack of evidence in the literature to support the use of animal and cadaver for robotic surgery training. The effectiveness of these models as a training tool is limited by logistical, ethical, financial and infection control issues. The latest evolution in synthetic organ model training for robotic surgery has been driven by new 3D-printing technology. Validated and cost-effective high-fidelity procedural models exist for robotic surgery training in urology. The development of synthetic models for the other specialties is not as mature. Expansion into multiple surgical disciplines and the widespread adoption of synthetic organ models for robotic simulation training will require the ability to engineer scalability for mass production. This would enable a transition in robotic surgical education where digital and synthetic organ models could be used in place of live animals and cadaver training to achieve robotic surgery competency.

Robot‐assisted scaffold implantation and two‐stage flap raising of the greater omentum for reconstruction of the facial skeleton: Description of a novel technique

“…There must always be the possibility to treat the patient in open surgery and to deal with complications. 15 Azadi et al reported that there are various training curricula, virtual reality simulators and other robotic training tools developed to enhance robotic surgical education and improve surgical skills. 16 Additionally, docking time is a limiting time factor which improves with increasing experience of the surgical team.…”

“…It needs a lot of surgical experience and expertise and should not be underestimated. There must always be the possibility to treat the patient in open surgery and to deal with complications 15 . Azadi et al.…”

Anatomical Engineering and 3D Printing for Surgery and Medical Devices: International Review and Future Exponential Innovations

“…The integration of AR, MR, VR, and 3D printing enables efficient training of physicians [ 280 ]. Preoperative evaluation and simulation using 3D imaging data allow surgeons to gain valuable experience and preoperatively practice surgical steps in a safe setting [ 281 ]. Additionally, these technologies allow real surgeries to be supervised by telepresence [ 282 ].…”

Transferability of robotic console skills by early robotic surgeons: a multi-platform crossover trial of simulation training

“…These curricula have previously enabled validation of simulation-based training in robotic surgery, with consensus opinion supporting this approach [3][4][5]. Despite the availability of multiple virtual reality simulators for robotic training [6], currently only the DaVinci Skills ® Simulator™ and the dV-Trainer ® have face, content, construct, concurrent and predictive validity [7] and Da Vinci technology currently dominates robotic education and training.…”