2017
DOI: 10.1007/s10853-017-1844-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A review of slip transfer: applications of mesoscale techniques

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
4

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 88 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A schematic illustration of the dislocation mechanisms operative in different length scale regimes is given in Figure . With decreasing layer thickness starting in the micron range the dominant deformation mechanisms change from dislocation pile‐up to confined layer slip (CLS) of dislocations (<50 nm) and finally to interface crossing of dislocations (slip transfer) (<2.5 nm) leading to strain localization that limits the uniform deformability . These mechanisms may be transferred to ARB by considering the peculiarities of interface‐mediated plasticity.…”
Section: Selected Arb Systemsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A schematic illustration of the dislocation mechanisms operative in different length scale regimes is given in Figure . With decreasing layer thickness starting in the micron range the dominant deformation mechanisms change from dislocation pile‐up to confined layer slip (CLS) of dislocations (<50 nm) and finally to interface crossing of dislocations (slip transfer) (<2.5 nm) leading to strain localization that limits the uniform deformability . These mechanisms may be transferred to ARB by considering the peculiarities of interface‐mediated plasticity.…”
Section: Selected Arb Systemsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Based on many experimental results, there are mainly four mechanisms of dislocation-GB interactions which have been studied: dislocation transmission across GB [12], GB as a dislocation source for lattice dislocation [13], formation of a dislocation pile-up [4] and dislocation absorption at GB [14]. The dislocation transmission is largely investigated through the geometrical transmission factor as reviewed by Bayerschen et al [15] and the critical stress for transmission as reviewed by Hunter et al [16]. The geometrical transmission factor has been firstly proposed by Livingston and Chalmers [17] considering only slip system orientations.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Despite this, most PFDD studies have focused on modeling dislocations in FCC materials, with a few modeling BCC dislocations [BH16,MKO11]. In FCC metals, PFDD studies have considered not only perfect dislocations but also partial dislocations [BH16,HZB14,HBGK11], heterophase interfaces [ZHBK16,HLB18], and deformation twinning [HB14a,HB15]. In recent years, they have successfully been advanced to model grain boundary sliding [KWLL11], grain boundary dislocation nucleation [HB14b,HZB14], glide in high entropy alloys [ZCK19], texture effects in thin films [CSPK17], formation and glide of partial dislocations in polycrystals [CHBK15], the presence of void space [LMK13], and slip transfer across biphase boundaries [ZHBK16,HLB18], again, all for FCC metals.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%