2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.emcon.2020.08.004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A review of sources, fate, levels, toxicity, exposure and transformations of organophosphorus flame-retardants and plasticizers in the environment

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
22
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 69 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 130 publications
0
22
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Compared with other OPEs, TCEP is more persistent. Due to potential toxicity and health effects, restrictions or prohibitions of TCEP have been issued in Canada, the United States and some European countries [ 1 ]. However, as a high-yield chlorinated OPE, TCEP is still widely used in some industrialized areas in China, and its health effects call for more attention.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Compared with other OPEs, TCEP is more persistent. Due to potential toxicity and health effects, restrictions or prohibitions of TCEP have been issued in Canada, the United States and some European countries [ 1 ]. However, as a high-yield chlorinated OPE, TCEP is still widely used in some industrialized areas in China, and its health effects call for more attention.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recently, some widely used brominated flame retardants, e.g., polybrominated diphenyl ethers (PBDEs), were banned or restricted due to their persistence, long-range atmospheric transport, bioaccumulation and potential adverse effects on mammals [ 1 ]. As alternatives to PBDEs, the consumption of organophosphate esters (OPEs) has surged, with an annual increase of 15% in China [ 2 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recent years, sediments have become the main focus of studies assessing OPFRs concentration because they are generally considered to be sinks for OPFRs (Tan et al 2016). In most of the studies, it was observed that nonchlorinated-OPFRs were more abundant in sediments compared to the chlorinated-OPFRs (Chokwe et al 2020). In the sediments of the Bohai Sea and the northern East China Sea, the concentration of OPFRs was as high as 169 ng.g −1 dw, with detection rate ranging from 1.1% ~ 94.5% (Liao et al 2020).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Among the organophosphorus compounds, organophosphate esters are increasingly used in the flame retardant industry. However, organophosphate esters from both flame retardant and pesticide application are also ubiquitous in abiotic, including air, water, dust, soil, sediment, and sludge, and biotic matrices, including birds, fish, and human tissue [ 21 , 22 , 23 ]. The determined levels and their distribution in different biotic and abiotic matrices indicate different patterns due to different consumption levels, different bioaccumulation and biomagnification capacities, different metabolic pathways, etc.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Estill et al reported that concentrations of organophosphate FR in air in the manufacturing, construction, and service sectors were higher and more prevalent than those of polybrominated diphenyl ethers [ 25 ]. More detailed information about the concentrations of organophosphorus-based flame retardants in the abiotic and biotic matrices can be found in the literature [ 7 , 21 , 22 , 26 , 27 ]. Results from toxicity testing, epidemiological studies, and risk assessments indicate that health concerns exist at current exposure levels for both halogenated and non-halogenated organophosphate ester flame retardants [ 28 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%