2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.esr.2022.100927
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A review of sustainable planning of Burundian energy sector in East Africa

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 59 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…To validate the accuracy of the model, existing literature has been reviewed. The EnergyPLAN model presented in this study and the data has been used in existing works of literature to evaluate the future energy system of different countries and regions including; Nigeria 88 , Middle East and North African region 89 , Algeria 90 , Burundi 91 , etc. Thereby validating the accuracy of the model for this analysis.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To validate the accuracy of the model, existing literature has been reviewed. The EnergyPLAN model presented in this study and the data has been used in existing works of literature to evaluate the future energy system of different countries and regions including; Nigeria 88 , Middle East and North African region 89 , Algeria 90 , Burundi 91 , etc. Thereby validating the accuracy of the model for this analysis.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Unlike fuzzy models such as FAHP, FTOPSIS, and FDEMATEL, which are better suited to handle uncertainties associated with decision-making problems (Khashei-Siuki and Sharifan, 2020; Shojaeimehr and Rahmani, 2022), we opted for the AHP approach for several reasons. The AHP remains a widely used method, either on its own or in combination with other MCDM models (Ilbahar et al, 2019; Manirambona et al, 2022). The popularity of AHP can be attributed to several factors: it is a simple and easily implementable approach that can be integrated with other techniques such as TOPSIS, EDAS, and fuzzy sets.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although it is not possible to specify which of these methods is the best, the AHP approach has grown in popularity for deciding the suitable sites for wind turbines (Dinçer et al 2023). Because it is simple, user-friendly, and consistent in its decision-making (Höfer et al 2016;Jamshed et al 2018;Elkadeem et al 2021;Manirambona et al 2022;Benti et al 2023;Rekik and El Alimi 2023;. For example, Tegou et al (2010) used the AHP method to determine the location of the wind power installation on the Greek island of Lesvos.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%