2019
DOI: 10.17159/2078-5151/2019/v57n1a2733
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A review of the complications encountered in a quaternary trauma intensive care unit in South Africa

Abstract: Background: Due to the invasive nature required for support and multiple therapeutic interventions, critically ill patients are at high risk of complications unrelated to their underlying illness or injury. This audit aimed to describe the spectrum of complications in a trauma intensive care unit, to identify potential remedial interventions to improve quality of care and reduce morbidity Methods: Complications in the Trauma Intensive Care Unit at Inkosi Albert Luthuli Central Hospital are documented prospecti… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
0
1

Year Published

2020
2020
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 23 publications
0
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…8 In a recent study at a South African quaternary intensive care unit, the median length of stay was 16 days for all admitted patients. 20 A median length of stay over 8 years in a high-income country ICU for all admissions was 6.5 days, 21 and this was also higher than the length of stay reported in this study. However, it is noted in all the mentioned studies that the length of stay was from total admissions and did not focus on the trauma subgroup.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 56%
“…8 In a recent study at a South African quaternary intensive care unit, the median length of stay was 16 days for all admitted patients. 20 A median length of stay over 8 years in a high-income country ICU for all admissions was 6.5 days, 21 and this was also higher than the length of stay reported in this study. However, it is noted in all the mentioned studies that the length of stay was from total admissions and did not focus on the trauma subgroup.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 56%