2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.fuel.2019.01.026
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A review of the current status of induced seismicity monitoring for hydraulic fracturing in unconventional tight oil and gas reservoirs

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
67
0
1

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

3
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 187 publications
(68 citation statements)
references
References 169 publications
0
67
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Seismic wave methods are well-developed detection techniques that have been widely used in reservoir (oil and gas) exploration [91]. In this case, hydrocarbon deposits usually are at a depth of hundreds of meters or even kilometres below the surface.…”
Section: Seismic Wave Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Seismic wave methods are well-developed detection techniques that have been widely used in reservoir (oil and gas) exploration [91]. In this case, hydrocarbon deposits usually are at a depth of hundreds of meters or even kilometres below the surface.…”
Section: Seismic Wave Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Hydraulic fracturing (HF) improves reservoir permeability by injecting high-pressure fluid into the ground to form a fracture network that is effectively connected to the wellbore [5][6][7]. Microseismic monitoring is generally implemented as a routine technology to monitor the development and expansion of fracturing networks in real time [8,9]. Additionally, microseismic monitoring technology has also been widely used for monitoring in other fields, including geothermal production, mining, carbon dioxide storage, and other industrial fields [10,11].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…More than 600 seismic activities connected with hydraulic fracturing were recorded in the northern Montney Play of British Columbia . Generally, the accepted view about induced earthquakes was the diffusion of pore pressure and its subsequent increase, effectively reducing the normal fault stress, releasing stored fault stress, and triggering an earthquake . Moreover, Dahm et al roughly defined “induced seismicity” and “triggered seismicity” according to whether it was occurred with human activities.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…13 Generally, the accepted view about induced earthquakes was the diffusion of pore pressure and its subsequent increase, effectively reducing the normal fault stress, releasing stored fault stress, and triggering an earthquake. 12,14,15 Moreover, Dahm et al 16 roughly defined "induced seismicity" and "triggered seismicity" according to whether it was occurred with human activities. Tan et al 17 stated that "induced" events and "triggered" events according to "wet" events directly associated with rock deformation or to "dry" events that governed by the stress changes, respectively.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%