2001
DOI: 10.1037/1064-1297.9.1.3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A review of the effects of perceived drug use opportunity on self-reported urge.

Abstract: Although persons addicted to drugs reliably report experiencing cravings or urges during drug cue exposure, less is known about factors that may moderate this effect. This article reviews cue exposure studies with people who smoke, are dependent on alcohol, or are addicted to cocaine or opiates. Perceived drug use opportunity is found to affect urge ratings. Specifically, people who are addicted to substances and who perceive an opportunity to consume their drug of choice report higher urges than do those who … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

15
159
2
1

Year Published

2005
2005
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 184 publications
(177 citation statements)
references
References 82 publications
15
159
2
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Reactivity to cigarette cues is stronger if a smoker believes that he or she will soon be allowed to smoke (Droungas et al 1995;Wertz and Sayette 2001). The prefrontal cortical activation to drug-associated cues is also highly influenced by perceived drug use availability (Wilson et al 2004).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…Reactivity to cigarette cues is stronger if a smoker believes that he or she will soon be allowed to smoke (Droungas et al 1995;Wertz and Sayette 2001). The prefrontal cortical activation to drug-associated cues is also highly influenced by perceived drug use availability (Wilson et al 2004).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…First, the videos contained narrative detail designed for the local milieu, and the autobiographical script would be expected to enhance these effects, but some participants might be non-responsive to the mostly impersonal cues (O'Brien et al, 1979;Staiger and White, 1991;Conklin et al, 2010). Alternatively, our low-craving participants may have had less intent to use drugs that day; active inhibition of craving can affect cue-induced appetitive states and corticolimbic activity (Wertz and Sayette, 2001;McBride et al, 2006;Volkow et al, 2010;Prisciandaro et al, 2012). Finally, recent animal studies suggest that DA responses to rewardrelated cues occur only in those subjects that imbue the cues with incentive salience; individual differences in these tendencies appear to be an inherited trait (Robinson and Flagel, 2009;Flagel et al, 2010).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Functional MRI of cue reactivity took place 20-25 min after smoking to permit the cardiovascular effects of smoking to dissipate. Subjects were informed of the opportunity to smoke immediately after each session because the expectation of drug availability has been shown to enhance subjective craving reports and physiological responses to smoking cues (Droungas et al, 1995;Carter and Tiffany, 2001;Dols et al, 2002; although see Wertz and Sayette, 2001).…”
Section: Fmri Experimental Designmentioning
confidence: 99%