1984
DOI: 10.1016/0263-2241(84)90020-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A review of the fundamental concepts of measurement

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
36
0
1

Year Published

1989
1989
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
8
1
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 115 publications
(37 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
0
36
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The modern form of measurement theory is representational: numbers assigned to objects/events must represent the perceived relations between the properties of those objects/events'' (Finkelstein and Leaning, 1984).…”
Section: Two Discriminant Criteria: Empiricity and Objectivitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The modern form of measurement theory is representational: numbers assigned to objects/events must represent the perceived relations between the properties of those objects/events'' (Finkelstein and Leaning, 1984).…”
Section: Two Discriminant Criteria: Empiricity and Objectivitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The real world is called the domain of the mapping, and the mathematical world is called the range [15, p. 29]]. A metric, then, is a function that maps an entity to a number or symbol in order to characterize a property of the entity [15]; and measurement is the process by which numbers or symbols are assigned to properties of entities in the real world in such a way as to describe them according to clearly defined rules [16,32]. As an example, consider the expression ''class.density.average-method-size''.…”
Section: Relational Measurement Theorymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…are all based on some underlying theory of measurement. An informal definition of measurement (given in [Finkelstein and Leaning 1984]) is shown in figure 2.…”
Section: Basic Measurement Theorymentioning
confidence: 99%