“…The misidentifications that occur during the process of developing the DNA barcode library of fish are normal because of morphological characteristics, i.e., phenotypic plasticity, new species, cryptic diversity, genotypic variation, or different life stages. In the present study, ambiguous delineation mainly appeared in the taxa or genera Alepes, Acanthopagrus, Johnius, Istiompax, Scomberoides, Rastrelliger, Decapterus, Carangoides, Saurida, Platycephalus, Epinephelus, Uranoscopus, Cynoglossus, Sillago, and Sardinella, and families Apogonidae, Bothidae, Clupeidae, Theraponidae, Trichiuridae, Mugilidae, and Engraulidae, among which misidentifications, cryptic diversity, and new species were common (Mat Jaafar et al, 2012;Qin et al, 2013;Gon et al, 2015;Tucker et al, 2016;Fricke, 2018;Hata and Motomura, 2018;Chao et al, 2019;Frable et al, 2019;Huang et al, 2020;Prokofiev, 2021;Xiao et al, 2021). Developing a reliable DNA barcode library for these taxa, with correct species identifications via morphology, or using multiple DNA fragments is recommended in future studies (Chakraborty et al, 2006;Hsu et al, 2009).…”