2018
DOI: 10.21093/ijeltal.v3i1.123
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Review of the IELTS Test: Focus on Validity, Reliability, and Washback

Abstract: The International English Language Test System (IELTS) is one of the most reputable English tests that is used to assess the language proficiency of those who intend to study or work in an English speaking context. It is one of the most large-scale proficiency tests which affects the lives of many students, as well as immigrants as the results of the test, are used for making critical decisions about the test takers. Moreover, the process of designing a good test requires a clear understanding of both validity… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The listening and reading comprehension tests were actual IELTS tests administered in accordance with Cambridge ESOL examination's guidelines. Although the statistics were indeed lower than the average Cronbach' Alpha of 0.88 recorded from the performance of more than 90,000 IELTS examinees by The University of Cambridge Local Examination Syndicate (UCLES) (2007, cited in Hashemi & Daneshfar, 2018), the reliability coefficients were within an acceptable range (0.7 or above) (Alavi et al, 2018;Pallant, 2010;Phakiti, 2016). Moreover, researchers in the field reported even lower reliability coefficients of 0.6 (Staehr, 2009) and 0.7 (Feng, 2016) for standardized international tests provided by Cambridge ESOL examination.…”
Section: Descriptive and Reliability Statisticsmentioning
confidence: 79%
“…The listening and reading comprehension tests were actual IELTS tests administered in accordance with Cambridge ESOL examination's guidelines. Although the statistics were indeed lower than the average Cronbach' Alpha of 0.88 recorded from the performance of more than 90,000 IELTS examinees by The University of Cambridge Local Examination Syndicate (UCLES) (2007, cited in Hashemi & Daneshfar, 2018), the reliability coefficients were within an acceptable range (0.7 or above) (Alavi et al, 2018;Pallant, 2010;Phakiti, 2016). Moreover, researchers in the field reported even lower reliability coefficients of 0.6 (Staehr, 2009) and 0.7 (Feng, 2016) for standardized international tests provided by Cambridge ESOL examination.…”
Section: Descriptive and Reliability Statisticsmentioning
confidence: 79%
“…Additionally, the researchers directed the present study to seek a wider range of possible contributing factors, including affective factors and language contact. Furthermore, the notion that the degree of attrition should be tested within 24 months after learners leave schools was based on the CEFR framework that the level of language users would reliably change after this duration (Hashemi & Daneshfar, 2018). Therefore, considering the different environments of a second language and foreign language and the fact that EFL learners are removed from the primary setting of English use after graduating schools, this study focuses on exploring the degree of attrition from the contributing factors, complemented by the calculation of the predictive power of different LMEs.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since 1989, IELTS has been an appropriate language requirement for entry to professional courses and further/higher education in the UK, Australia and New Zealand (Charge & Taylor, 1997), especially IELTS Academic (Hashemi & Daneshfar, 2018). For example, in the UK, it is the most widely recognised test of English for academic purposes (Green, 2007).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Both versions are scored in the same way. The applicants take the first three parts of the test during one session (first listening, then reading, and finally writing) with no breaks in between (Hashemi & Daneshfar, 2018).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%