2017
DOI: 10.1007/s10531-017-1341-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A review of the impact of pipelines and power lines on biodiversity and strategies for mitigation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
38
1
3

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 50 publications
(42 citation statements)
references
References 54 publications
0
38
1
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Given that LTI managers have most interest in knowing the potential of linear transportation infrastructure (LTI) verges as a corridor for biodiversity and that we found few studies addressing this question we advise to dedicate resources on the monitoring of vertebrate movements on verges. The systematic review on insect biodiversity on LTI verges led to the same recommendation, with even fewer studies on the role of corridor of verges for insects (2 studies) than for vertebrates (7). Also, for vertebrates, when they exist the studies rarely directly measured movements on verges.…”
Section: Implications For Researchmentioning
confidence: 98%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Given that LTI managers have most interest in knowing the potential of linear transportation infrastructure (LTI) verges as a corridor for biodiversity and that we found few studies addressing this question we advise to dedicate resources on the monitoring of vertebrate movements on verges. The systematic review on insect biodiversity on LTI verges led to the same recommendation, with even fewer studies on the role of corridor of verges for insects (2 studies) than for vertebrates (7). Also, for vertebrates, when they exist the studies rarely directly measured movements on verges.…”
Section: Implications For Researchmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Linear transportation infrastructures (LTIs) have led to habitat loss and degradation, fragmentation and barrier effects, light and noise disturbance, chemical pollution and direct mortality (e.g. road kill, electrocution) [3][4][5][6][7][8]. In particular, the splitting of natural habitats and ecosystems into smaller and more isolated patches (i.e.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The power lines pose additional effects of electromagnetic fields which cause avoidance by some animals (Bartzke et al, 2014) . Oil spills from pipelines add to the effects, despite being rare they can be very devastating on environment and last for longer time (Richardson et al, 2017). Most of the available studies are not only based in Europe and America (Benítez-López, Alkemade & Verweij 2010;Richardson et al, 2017), but they are also largely focused on large animals in relation to separate infrastructure types.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Oil spills from pipelines add to the effects, despite being rare they can be very devastating on environment and last for longer time (Richardson et al, 2017). Most of the available studies are not only based in Europe and America (Benítez-López, Alkemade & Verweij 2010;Richardson et al, 2017), but they are also largely focused on large animals in relation to separate infrastructure types. This focus may not always be considered as effective representative of small mammals (Caro, 2001) especially from tropical savannahs.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The key drivers of biodiversity loss have been identified as land use and land cover changes, pollution, climate change, and infrastructure development [3][4][5][6][7]. Linear infrastructures such as roads, railways, powerlines, pipelines, and irrigation canals have negative impacts [8,9], including habitat loss and fragmentation, disturbance due to barrier and edge effects, encroachments, road mortality, enhancement of invasive species, and increased illegal activities such as poaching and logging [9][10][11]. These sorts of development also alter and reshape habitats [12], which result in reduced wildlife population sizes and viability [13].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%