2019
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-030-11991-1_2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Review of the Literature on Socioeconomic Status and Educational Achievement

Abstract: The foundations of socioeconomic inequities and the educational outcomes of efforts to reduce gaps in socioeconomic status are of great interest to researchers around the world, and narrowing the achievement gap is a common goal for most education systems. This review of the literature focuses on socioeconomic status (SES) and its related constructs, the association between SES and educational achievement, and differences among educational systems, together with changes over time. Commonly-used proxy variables… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
47
0
6

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
2
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 86 publications
(53 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
0
47
0
6
Order By: Relevance
“…All factors were reported by parents, except birthweight, which was ascertained from clinical records. Adult SEP was considered a potential intermediary based on established associations with both early-life SEP[33,34] and frailty[21,35]. It was represented here by occupational class at42y (or if missing at 33y (n=829(9.52%)), grouped into four categories from professional/managerial (classes I and II) to partly skilled/unskilled manual (classes IV and V) and educational attainment by 33y, grouped into four categories from <0-levels to degree or higher (see Table 2 footnotes for details).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…All factors were reported by parents, except birthweight, which was ascertained from clinical records. Adult SEP was considered a potential intermediary based on established associations with both early-life SEP[33,34] and frailty[21,35]. It was represented here by occupational class at42y (or if missing at 33y (n=829(9.52%)), grouped into four categories from professional/managerial (classes I and II) to partly skilled/unskilled manual (classes IV and V) and educational attainment by 33y, grouped into four categories from <0-levels to degree or higher (see Table 2 footnotes for details).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As school engagement is typically conceptualized as a multidimensional construct including behavior, emotions, and cognition, which are considered interrelated [5][6][7][8], future studies should seek to examine all these dimensions concurrently. Furthermore, our model did not include an assess-ment of socioeconomic status, which may have an influence especially on the academic achievement of students, although the magnitude of such associations depends on the social context and education system [57]. As the vast majority of research has focused on associations of socioeconomic status and academic achievement rather than school engagement, the assessment of family-level or school-level socioeconomic status was not included in the model.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The private school pupils were more likely to bring lunchboxes to schools when compared to the public school pupils. This may be because pupils who attend private schools come from families that are more financially stable than the families of children who attend public schools [21].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%