2014
DOI: 10.4236/psych.2014.514175
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Review of the Measures Designed to Assess DSM-5 Personality Disorders

Abstract: The definition, classification and assessment of personality disorders (PDs) have attracted considerable debate for nearly 50 years. This paper attempts a comprehensive review of the instruments to assess all, or specific, individual disorders as described in DSM-5, including structured interviews and inventories. The review should be helpful for clinicians, researchers and also industrial and organizational psychologists, to screen and assess the personality pathology spectrum from subclinical manifestations … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
30
0
3

Year Published

2014
2014
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7
2
1

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 51 publications
(33 citation statements)
references
References 141 publications
0
30
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Concerning methodology, we used the SCID-II interview to diagnose personality disorders. However, research highlights the importance of adopting a dimensional approach to adolescent personality pathology, and thus future studies might do well to use measures designed to assess DSM-5 personality disorders that are currently validated for younger age groups (Furnham, Milner, Akhtar, & De Fruyt, 2014). In addition, we used the AAP-a narrative attachment measurement like the AAI-to assess attachment representations and analyze attachment-related traumatic contents.…”
Section: Limitationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Concerning methodology, we used the SCID-II interview to diagnose personality disorders. However, research highlights the importance of adopting a dimensional approach to adolescent personality pathology, and thus future studies might do well to use measures designed to assess DSM-5 personality disorders that are currently validated for younger age groups (Furnham, Milner, Akhtar, & De Fruyt, 2014). In addition, we used the AAP-a narrative attachment measurement like the AAI-to assess attachment representations and analyze attachment-related traumatic contents.…”
Section: Limitationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A agenda de pesquisa inclui estudos de validade convergente com outras medidas e modelos teóricos acerca da personalidade e dos transtornos da personalidade, como o modelo dos cinco fatores da personalidade e o modelo alternativo do DSM-5 para os transtornos da personalidade (Furnham et al, 2014;Gore & Wildiger, 2013). Análises psicométricas complementares, como a análise fatorial confirmatória e o uso de modelos da teoria de resposta ao item, também integram essa agenda.…”
Section: Discussionunclassified
“…Its aim is partly to help selectors and individuals themselves diagnose how they typically react under work stress. The HDS was explicitly based on the DSM-IV-TR Axis II Personality Disorder descriptions, but it was not developed for the assessment of all DSM-IV-TR disorders or those remaining in DSM V [15][16][17]. The HDS focuses only on the core construct of each disorder from a dimensional perspective [18].…”
Section: Measuring Sub-clinical Pds: the Hdsmentioning
confidence: 99%